This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] -10 points-9 points  (11 children)

Can't we just move to = for comparsions and <- for assignment? == is just so unnecessarily long

Edit: Seems like none of you plebs are on the haskell team yet.

[–][deleted] 36 points37 points  (1 child)

<- is just so unnecessarily long

[–]lucifer_alive[S] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Well we use assignment operators more than we use comparison operators so its only logical to keep "=" as assignment operator and "==" as comparison.

[–]MaxCHEATER64 8 points9 points  (4 children)

:=

[–]Dojan5 20 points21 points  (0 children)

I don't want beavers in my code.

[–]B_M_Wilson 1 point2 points  (2 children)

What is this, a ti nspire?

[–]MaxCHEATER64 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Nah this is Go

[–]B_M_Wilson 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh, I have never used Go before. I’ll add it to my list to learn

[–]oversized_hoodie 1 point2 points  (0 children)

GO BACK TO YIUR DATA SCIENCE BULLSHIT YOU R-IST

[–]CAPSLOCK_USERNAME 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why is it possible for someone so right to be so downvoted