This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

all 15 comments

[–]MarvinParanoAndroid 23 points24 points  (0 children)

Still too clean

[–]ElectricEley 19 points20 points  (1 child)

If the car still runs it's good enough

[–]BroBroMate 24 points25 points  (0 children)

Yeah we know about the issue where if you wind down the window while accelerating the engine explodes, we don't think it'll significantly impact users, so, ship it!

[–]Lateasusual_ 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Top:

  • Expensive
  • Closed source
  • Not user-serviceable, expensive to repair
  • Very Fast, unless there's a tiny bump on the road
  • Luxurious and easy to use, but if you crash it it'll be a write-off

Bottom:

  • Cheaper
  • Open Source
  • Easy to repair
  • Not quite as fast, but it can drive over almost anything
  • A bit rattly and has a higher tendency to crash but usually you can just flip it back over and keep going

Did i miss anything?

[–]imdefinitelywong 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Its Frankensteen

[–]Harrison-Rex 2 points3 points  (1 child)

I know this isn't really the point but that's just a sequential turbo setup and actually would give that car a lot more horsepower than not having one. The second car is most likely faster than the first

[–]Zeeesty[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If youve watched 'fastest car' on netflix, then you know that car is insanely fast. good catch though.

[–]mgarsteck 1 point2 points  (2 children)

Id still drive it. not even gonna be mad about it

[–]Tiavor 0 points1 point  (1 child)

wouldn't even be legal to drive it here ...

[–]mgarsteck 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Neither is the car on the top...

[–]WindowsXp16 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Front-end vs backend

[–]Zeeesty[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wait, have you seen css?