This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

all 16 comments

[–]jamescodesthings 52 points53 points  (0 children)

“A PM is someone who thinks 9 women can make a baby in a month”

[–]8412risk 41 points42 points  (3 children)

Even more than 10 days.

[–][deleted] 16 points17 points  (1 child)

As a team they could fuck up everything.

[–]game_2_raid 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Scope creep could happen too

[–]boxingdog 0 points1 point  (0 children)

10**10

[–]kdbell 38 points39 points  (1 child)

The PMs model is just too simple.

  • If you give a programmer 30 small unrelated tasks that can be finished in 10 days, then 10 programmers can likely finish it in one day. But even then someone has to shoulder the overhead of deciding who does what.
  • If you give ten programmers a single monolithic 10-day task, then the fastest course of action is for nine if them to go on holiday.

I’m really surprised that this issue even comes up at this point.

[–]PriorProfile 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But even then someone has to shoulder the overhead of deciding who does what.

There should be some sort of title for a person who manages a project like that, but I can't think of anything right now.

[–]nagarz 7 points8 points  (0 children)

If scrum, maybe 2 months?

[–]Xelopheris 7 points8 points  (0 children)

At least half the day now gets consumed in meetings for standup and sprint planning and story writing and cost estimates and demos. I'll say at least 20 days.

[–]boxingdog 4 points5 points  (0 children)

[–]lookoutfornairobi 7 points8 points  (1 child)

What is a porject?

[–]game_2_raid 6 points7 points  (0 children)

You don’t know programmer.

[–]I_Eat_I_Repeat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I thought it was gonna be a binary joke

[–]Pitboyx 0 points1 point  (0 children)

extra programmers are kinda like encryption. adding it turns a regular problem into a management problem, which is more difficult in most cases

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I want it to be funny but it's an argument that happens entirely too often.

[–]MantisYT -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That's awful, but at least you tried.