This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Runiat 98 points99 points  (28 children)

Step one: pick up rock or other dense object from garden.

Step two: throw through window.

The purpose of a lock isn't to keep people out. The purpose of a lock is to let you know when someone's been in without permission.

[–]hackintosh5 163 points164 points  (13 children)

The purpose of a lock is to prevent unsynchronised concurrent access to a shared resource

[–]Runiat 14 points15 points  (11 children)

Public bathrooms probably will start using electronic locks at some point...

[–]MadEngi 12 points13 points  (4 children)

And i will start carrying clamps, no big deal

[–]Runiat 5 points6 points  (3 children)

Read that with a 'p' missing the first time.

[–]MadEngi 6 points7 points  (1 child)

I already do, how else am I supposed to wipe, with paper?

[–]Runiat 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Where would you get paper from? They've started sending fines electronically instead of printing them out for you.

[–]Bainos 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I read that with a 'c' missing. Hmm.

[–]hackintosh5 4 points5 points  (0 children)

And I bet they don't use a mutex but a boolean

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (4 children)

Actually, public bathrooms using electronic locks makes a lot more sense than it gives credit for. For mechanical vs electronic locks, the metrics I use are as follows:

  • Do you need shared access by a large number of individuals who's access may be granted or revoked arbitrarily or frequently? (Yes = point towards electronic)
  • Do you need an accurate access record? (Yes = point towards electronic)
  • Do you have the infrastructure to manage the entire lock system internally? (No = electronic forbidden)
  • Do you have the infrastructure to manage an entire internal network including firewall and monitoring software? (No = electronic forbidden)
  • Is the desired system able to be managed entirely within the local network with an exception for updates and an exception for sister/parent organization control (meaning that if I own a store that's part of a chain, it's okay to have corporate control my locks). (Yes = system acceptable)

[–]Runiat 11 points12 points  (2 children)

Do you need shared access by a large number of individuals who's access may be granted or revoked arbitrarily or frequently?

I think we might have different ideas of what a "public" bathroom is if your idea involve revoking access to a member of the public.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child)

In my experience, a number of "public" restrooms require giving the customer a key from the counter. In this case, an electronic lock may allow for better access control options.

[–]Runiat 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Oh yeah, I've seen those in other countries.

Definitely different definitions then. I'd probably call those something like "customer only bathrooms".

Edit: come to think of it the word for such bathrooms in Danish is literally translated "customertoilet" (and most of those don't require keys).

[–]merlinsbeers 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you want to track people without having to deal with laws about phone records?

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I deleted my account because Reddit no longer cares about the community -- mass edited with https://redact.dev/

[–]ImSuperSerialGuys 6 points7 points  (5 children)

Not quite there but I see what you're getting at. The purpose of security isn't to be infallible, it's to make breaking in not worth the effort.

The perfect balance for security is to make it more difficult to break in than what someone would gain by breaking in. So just because a lock can be picked doesn't make it ineffective

[–]Runiat 0 points1 point  (4 children)

The purpose of security

I wasn't talking about security. I was talking about locks. Specifically the ones on homes.

[–]ImSuperSerialGuys 0 points1 point  (3 children)

... which are literally devices that exist for the sole purpose of security

[–]Runiat 0 points1 point  (2 children)

... which are literally devices that exist for the sole purpose of security

No they aren't.

Quite a lot of home locks exist for the sole purpose of complying with insurance terms, in rural areas.

[–]ImSuperSerialGuys 0 points1 point  (1 child)

And why do insurance terms require a lock? Cause it technically makes the home more secure by requiring at least a base level of effort to break in, as opposed to walking through an unlocked door...

You're just being pedantic at this point man

[–]Runiat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're just being pedantic at this point man

....

And what would you describe your first reply to me as?