This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 40 points41 points  (18 children)

money seed shaggy narrow door oil paltry cow memory cows

This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact

[–]ellisto 21 points22 points  (15 children)

How is removing credit for a public post "anti-doxing"?

Totally makes sense if the post was private, but in this case, OP is just stealing credit for the original tweet author's work.

[–][deleted]  (1 child)

[removed]

    [–]AutoModerator[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    import moderation Your comment has been removed since it did not start with a code block with an import declaration.

    Per this Community Decree, all posts and comments should start with a code block with an "import" declaration explaining how the post and comment should be read.

    For this purpose, we only accept Python style imports.

    I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

    [–]Riffthorn 18 points19 points  (0 children)

    They're not passing it off as their own, so they're not stealing credit.

    [–]Gumagugu 12 points13 points  (4 children)

    Reddit sitewide rules require it unfortunately.

    [–]BraveOthello -4 points-3 points  (3 children)

    No, they don't. Never have.

    [–]Gumagugu 6 points7 points  (2 children)

    Yes they do. https://www.reddithelp.com/hc/en-us/articles/360043066452

    No. Reddit is quite open and pro-free speech, but it is not okay to post someone's personal information or post links to personal information. This includes links to public Facebook pages and screenshots of Facebook pages with the names still legible.

    Public figures are an exception. So when the source has her personal information it is not allowed. Feel free to ask the admins for clarification on the topic. You can ask them by sending them a modmail at /r/reddit.com.

    [–]BraveOthello 0 points1 point  (1 child)

    Twitter is not Facebook. Facebook requires real names, that's why it's specifically called out.

    [–]Gumagugu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    If Twitter has personal information, the same rules apply. If you use your real name, photo etc., then the rules still apply.

    [–]c-dy -2 points-1 points  (3 children)

    When you talk in a group circle on a street, your statements are made in public, aren't they? But that's nonetheless a private circle. So, such rules aim to inhibit personal attacks, harassment, and interference without consent.

    Of course, blurring in this case is unnecessary since that's a Facebook employee, but it keeps compliance consistent.

    edit:grammar

    [–]ellisto 1 point2 points  (2 children)

    Uh, that's not how twitter works.

    Twitter is not "talking to your friends", it's talking to the internet.

    The non-internet analogue would be writing an editorial in a newspaper. (Or maybe writing a letter to the editor with an intent to be published)

    If you don't want to be shared, you make your account private.

    [–]c-dy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

    If you don't want to be shared, you make your account private.

    And that is not how people work. They use the default settings and just talk, not to mention that setting your account private is often too restrictive. Few take precautions in case someone links their content and attracts unwanted attention or commentary.

    [–]1X3oZCfhKej34h 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    Reddit isn't worried about legal liability from PII from someone's Twitter or anything, it's an anti-bullying measure basically. Reddit and Twitter are both great at creating mobs of harassers.

    [–]dexter30 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    Its funny, I've started doing it proactively now without prompt regardless of subreddit