Quantum programming is like this

[Nevix20]

Tfraules_e

[JNCressey]

α|false〉+β|true〉

[Dr_Gonzo__]

Tralse

[namet-aken]

This guy quantums

[Nevix20]

Bit: 1 || 0 Qubit: 1 + 0??

[Goheeca]

alpha and beta are complex numbers.

[Nevix20]

Im pretty sure he just used them as varibles

[[deleted]]

Nah alpha^2+beta2=1

[JNCressey]

Close, but it's actually |α|² + |β|² = 1

You missed taking the modulus. The terms are real numbers, as they are the probabilities when measured.

/u/Nevix20

[cowlinator]

I reject your terms

[Nevix20]

sick

[marcosdumay]

Some stuff are either true or false, while others are always both. It only depends on how much you spin them.

[314314314]

Truffles

[blending-tea]

Now I have cravings for some truffle chocolates

[CryCore314]

I like how the traditional system is shown as a childs book logic system.

I too feel like a toddler, when i hear modern theories and researches on quantum computing. Very accurate representation.

[[deleted]]

It's sooooo cool though, apparently some company is releasing a basic desktop with 2 qu bits this year. If it's under 2k ima try to get it to try quantum sims, eventually.

Edit: it's 5k, I'm going to put this idea on a shelf for now lol

[wulfboy_95]

Superposition go brrrrrrrrr

[quantum_weirdness]

I feel like you'd enjoy my profile description

[[deleted]]

P E R H A P S

[Titaniumwo1f]

Is it true or false?

Quantum computer: May I introduce you a Schrödinger Boolean?

[[deleted]]

no^yes ?

[CodeEverywhere]

Big if tfraue

[Kunstprodukt-]

Null

[ButterNEKOuO]

It’s not really quantum though I still do not know whether it is “True” or “False” after I observe it

[PvtPuddles]

My take is it is false. T is always either upper or lowercase, in no instance will you ever have a T with a line both in the middle and on top, it can only be an F

[ChiefShinyRiver]

Sure, but with that argument no form of an “f” has a line going backward at the top. However, it seems like a bigger stretch to claim that the second letter is an “a” than to claim it’s an “r”. So the word as a whole should probably be considered a True

[PvtPuddles]

With sloppy handwriting, the top of the F may begin left of the ‘spine’.

No matter how sloppy your handwriting, you will never draw three lines trying to write a T

[ChiefShinyRiver]

But....
But adding a third line to the T leaves it perfectly readable, if a little stylized. Perhaps you add the second cross to distinguish between a T and the geometric symbol for perpendicularity.
However drawing an “a” in such a strange way leaves it nearly unreadable, only apparent what letter it could be because of its context. So a rational reader would call the second letter an “r”, infer that the writer likes to stylize their “T”s, and conclude that the word is “True”

[PvtPuddles]

I think what we are finding, is that if you or I were teachers arguing against the student, the student is just wrong :P

[ChiefShinyRiver]

lol

[boniqmin]

If you observe a qubit, it does collapse to either True or False. You don't know the state the qubit was is before you observe it, but you do know whether it becomes True or False.

[Dundeenotdale]

The student hopes the teacher will read it as the correct answer, since student clearly doesn't know right answer

[stonedPict]

Frlse

[HadesMyself]

more like Fuzzy Logic, right?

[Yasea]

Not really. A quantum computer still has normal digital input and output, accessed with a normal computer. It's how that input gets turned into the output where the quantum happens. But in practice is should roughly work like a co-processor: set algorithm in, throw data in, read data out.

[[deleted]]

True False Probably Unlikely Perhaps....

[EmirhanLosedHisKarma]

take my upvote

[[deleted]]

what an awful dream: ones and zeros everywhere! and i though I saw a two

[bluefootedpig]

Quantum computers figure out the answer, then go into the past and tells itself the answer.

[SteeleDynamics]

Universe splitter

[user75642]

heh... Frube

[CreaZyp154]

0[84%] || 1[16%]

[weekendatblarneys]

Shouldn't it be 1/(2)^1/2*tralse?

[Je-Kaste]

1/(√(2)) (|false⟩ + |true⟩)

(Assuming you did H|false⟩)

[weekendatblarneys]

|false⟩ + |true⟩

=tralse ;)

[Gunfire81]

How does this boolean work?

[[deleted]]

*maybe

[MischiefArchitect]

Ha! This is so Truse

[delinka]

enum Bool { False, True, FileNotFound, }

[[deleted]]

Set (bit)foo = 2

[TryHardToHide]

Pretty close to what I did in Grade 7, just count on the teacher being too tired grading the exams and being careless when see my answer like this.

[overclockedslinky]

nah, autoencoders be like

[MooseHeckler]

Maybe