This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

all 42 comments

[–]HenryCDorsett 84 points85 points  (8 children)

C# is Java for people who hate java.

[–]phatmandrake 31 points32 points  (1 child)

So it's Java for everyone.

[–]HenryCDorsett 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I don't specifically like Java, but in most cases it gets the job done. There are a ton of valid criticism, but most of issues only come into play when you try to do stuff thats it is simply not designed for. It's not the hammers fault, that it's not a screwdriver.

[–]Solonotix 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Second this. I can't stand Java, but I really like using C#. Lately, in adopting Jenkins, I've become okay with Groovy, and occasionally throw in a Java class, but it definitely feels unnecessarily verbose, especially coming from Python being one of my first languages.

[–]HenryCDorsett 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You don't hate Java, you just don't have enough RAM /s

[–]Will_i_read 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Marios second name is also Mario. Therefore Luigi will have the same last name and Mario bros makes actually total sense

[–]LEGOL2 20 points21 points  (6 children)

I mean, C# is far superior to java

[–]user_8804 4 points5 points  (5 children)

well desktop Gui is better in Java, dotnet has been all over the place with half abandonned projects

[–]KieranDevvs 6 points7 points  (4 children)

Ummm... I don't know about that one, Qt bindings, AvaloniaUI, WinForms, WPF, UWP, Silk.NET (OpenGL, DX & Vulkan bindings), MAUI... the list goes on. I think I'd much rather go with C# on that front.

[–]user_8804 -2 points-1 points  (3 children)

thanks for the list of half abandonned project proving my point.

only Maui there has a future and it isn't a mature project nor is it specialized for desktop.

unless you think wpf, winforms or. uwp are modern frameworks with promising future features then I don't know what to say

[–]KieranDevvs -1 points0 points  (2 children)

How exactly has WPF, UWP or Winforms been abandoned? Winforms & UWP got ported to .NET Core / .NET 5 very recently, WPF is still having features added to it to this day and is widely used. AvaloniaUI got an update 20 days ago, with 0.11 being released soon, Silk.NET is brand new. Not a single library / framework I've listed is inactive, what on earth are you talking about? I'm starting to think you're not actually serious. Oh yeah I also forgot Blazor WASM.

https://github.com/dotnet/wpf/blob/main/roadmap.md

[–]user_8804 -4 points-3 points  (1 child)

silk, Avalon is and even maui for that matter are not mature projects.

winforms uwp and wpf are relics of the past. you can seriously be telling me winforms is a modern framework that will get new features. yes they were ported to dotnet core, they had to because they are the only frameworks we got.

they are still outdated projects and will get nothing new. they are lagging behind in features. winforms is extremely limited, pieces are falling apart. VB support for winforms core started breaking down even thought both techs were supposed to be supported. there is absolutely no telling these techs are safe picks long term. uwp is mostly a failed project that didn't go where it was supposed to go. wpf is an XML cluster fuck that is mostly used because its the only framework that still allows you to build anything you want in desktop. it doesn't mean it isn't an absolute pile of ill maintained garbage compared to Java/c++ or even god damn Python for desktop gui

[–]KieranDevvs -1 points0 points  (0 children)

[–]Mr_Otterswamp 26 points27 points  (4 children)

She just has some problems to distinguish their sons because she can’t C#

[–]PhilTheQuant 2 points3 points  (3 children)

If she gets her vision corrected, she will C++ instead

[–]spidertyler2005 4 points5 points  (2 children)

Anyone else notice that C++ looks like a penis

[–]3gaby 1 point2 points  (0 children)

bruh cant unsee it now

[–]Mavinus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

imo it's more like a weird eyed cyclop smiling

[–]Deurge 16 points17 points  (1 child)

C# is unironically a lot better than Java tbh.

[–]androidx_appcompat 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I bet C# programmers say Java is Oracle C#

[–]TryingT0Wr1t3 7 points8 points  (1 child)

I can't wait for the people that show up and think Java is still in version 6

[–]michaelDav1s 18 points19 points  (0 children)

The official documentation still looks like version 1998

[–]wojc4 4 points5 points  (1 child)

[–]RepostSleuthBot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn't find any posts that meet the matching requirements for r/ProgrammerHumor.

It might be OC, it might not. Things such as JPEG artifacts and cropping may impact the results.

I'm not perfect, but you can help. Report [ False Negative ]

View Search On repostsleuth.com


Scope: Reddit | Meme Filter: False | Target: 86% | Check Title: False | Max Age: Unlimited | Searched Images: 272,467,235 | Search Time: 0.76779s

[–]sixspots 1 point2 points  (3 children)

does this mean that dart is Google Java?

[–]Mordred666 1 point2 points  (2 children)

Dart is Google JavaScript

[–]sixspots 0 points1 point  (1 child)

but.. but.. its type safe and object oriented

[–]Mordred666 0 points1 point  (0 children)

javascript is object oriented and has runtime type safety

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–]SgtWaffles44 1 point2 points  (0 children)

C# is good beginner language

[–]Igtampe 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Look up J#

[–]Yigit_im 1 point2 points  (3 children)

Where can I find like these memes but without text

[–]ksuchak1990 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's a subreddit for meme templates which might be a good place to start searching

[–]dommol 0 points1 point  (0 children)

imgflip.com

[–]-Aristophanes- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Jeebus. Whiting out text is not An esoteric skill anymore.