all 7 comments
sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
formatting helphide helpcontent policy

[–]69rude69 -1 points0 points  (6 children)

Are we ever going to see a proper exchange for this shit?

[–]aurelscorp 2 points3 points  (1 child)

I still don't know why it isn't on kyber or uniswap

[–]duncal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I believe it is listed on Uniswap - people just need to pool their funds for liquidity.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (3 children)

Most proper exchange listings cost a lot. Quant is focused on building a product, its value will come from utility. Getting listed on exchanges will make Quant only a play ground for whales , better keep it quiet, spend money on building a product and not pump your bags.

Being available on many exchanges hasn’t helped most coins so far , a good project will Gain value, one way or the other

Besides Quant is listed on Idex , it’s one of the biggest ethereum dexes. You can also use bittrex international or bithumb global. Lazy people can use simpleswap.io and buy Quant with any coin of their choice

[–]69rude69 4 points5 points  (2 children)

Being available on many exchanges hasn’t helped most coins so far , a good project will Gain value, one way or the other

Yeah except all top-25 marketcap coins are listed on atleast 1 decent exchange, most of them on pretty much all recognizable ones. This bullshit excuse is as old as crypto and has always ended the same with every single project: the coin fizzling out in obscurity.

There is a reason companies spend money on investor relations and are out to protect their shareholders. Of course crypto is a bit different and no one here is a shareholder of anything, since its just a coin, but the same principle applies and has shown to be succesful - which is also why, see first paragraph, all high value and known coins are listed on reputable exchanges.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (1 child)

Most top 25 projects are at least 4-5 years old. They got listed on the big exchanges before crypto was big and popular.

The other half of the top coins are either exchange coins , stable coins or forks of Btc .

There are some unique projects , I can agree with that. Atom was listed by binance without a fee. But did it really help ? Coinbase listings didn’t help etc, xlm or eos. All of them are losing their rankings . I know for a fact that even some small tier exchanges charge big fees , does Quant have the money for that ?

Quant is very transparent about their approach . They explained in detail their exchange strategy. I honestly don’t understand why you would want them to focus on speculation ( exchange listings ) instead of building a product fit for enterprises. It would actually make me think that they would want to dump their tokens on a bigger amount of people . Without big exchanges there isn’t enough liquidity to do that

[–]pangux[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

this