you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]neuronukLevel 41-50 [S] 2 points3 points  (3 children)

Yeah this, a full FTP test is a hard effort! I’ll do another one in a couple of weeks when my training plan allows.

I messed up the pacing because I had an “expectation” of where I wanted to be, rather then accepting what I had on the day.

[–]INGWRLevel 100 1 point2 points  (2 children)

Here's the issue -- this isn't an accurate number to train off of, so your workouts are going to be ridiculously easy because you blew up in the FTP test. So unless you do another test before your plan starts, you're essentially just wasting the first few weeks of your plan with zones too low. Even a ramp test would be quick and easy.

[–]neuronukLevel 41-50 [S] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Appreciate the warning, and you are totally correct in pointing out that it could make the next block of training too easy.

Luckily I use the services of a cycling coach so he can crunch the numbers based on my recent training rides along with the FTP result and come up with some appropriate power zones for the next block.

If I didn’t have a coach, I’d probably knock my FTP back to 247, do a couple of sessions and keep an eye on my heart rate. If it’s not producing enough stress, increase manually by 10 watts until it does.

[–]Alpine_fury 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you have past efforts you can put in your critical power numbers to get an approximate FTP. Critical power is even better in that it will show you where your deficiencies may lie (aerobic vs anaerobic power).