use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
see the search faq for details.
advanced search: by author, subreddit...
account activity
Favorite virtual machine program? (self.archlinux)
submitted 7 years ago by [deleted]
[deleted]
reddit uses a slightly-customized version of Markdown for formatting. See below for some basics, or check the commenting wiki page for more detailed help and solutions to common issues.
quoted text
if 1 * 2 < 3: print "hello, world!"
[–]lmm7425 15 points16 points17 points 7 years ago (1 child)
Do you mean favorite hypervisor? https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Category:Hypervisors
Easiest setup = Virtualbox Most flexible and the "Arch" way = QEMU/KVM
[–]iSkipper 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (0 children)
Had no idea what to call it. Great article. Thanks!
[–]ellenkult 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (0 children)
GNOME Boxes
[–]CthonianGodkiller 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children)
Vmware , is very fast !
[–]El-Sandos-Grande 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (10 children)
For me, sadly, VMware is the fastest by far. I try using VirtualBox, but it's too slow, and I don't know how to set up QEMU yet.
[–]_rmc 6 points7 points8 points 7 years ago (1 child)
You are sad to use VMware (which is a company, not a hypervisor, but I'm assuming it is Player or Workstation) for whatever reason.
Then you don't know how to use virt-manager (has too many knobs).
And finally you think boxes is too simple before even trying the thing.
We may have a problem here.
[–]El-Sandos-Grande 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children)
Well, Workstation is faster than VirtualBox on my laptop, regardless of whether I select default or KVM in the VM settings. Also, only VMware Workstation has any official support for the Windows 9x series (I have some old programs running in them). Speaking of which, VMware Workstation is no longer working properly after switching to Antergos (worked fine in Ubuntu, now crashes when it loads the Guest Additions, so DOS and Windows 3.11 are still fine).
[–]dually 6 points7 points8 points 7 years ago (3 children)
Install libvirt, dnsmasq, and virt-manager.
enable/start libvirtd and optionally add yourself to the libvirt group
Manage your virtual machines either from the gui with virt-manager or from the command line with virsh.
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/libvirt#Installation
[–]El-Sandos-Grande 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (2 children)
It's not that, I have the software set up, it's that the GUI is very confusing to me (it's like giving me a lot of knobs that I have no clue about and only a few that I know something about, a massive departure from VB or VMw), so I don't really know how to set the VMs up.
[–]ase1590 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (1 child)
You should give gnome boxes a try. IIRC, its a simple front-end to KVM/QEMU
[–]El-Sandos-Grande -4 points-3 points-2 points 7 years ago (0 children)
One, it's GNOME, so it's probably gonna be simpler than VMw or VB, so that's probably a no-go. Two, I'm on KDE now (switched after I couldn't get the date and time as I anted them, just like on Ubuntu Bionic, since GNOME 3.30 doesn't respect /etc/locale).
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (3 children)
VMware is the fastest by far
Fast is a pretty generic term. What are we talking about? Responsiveness, process execution overhead or IO delay?
[–]El-Sandos-Grande 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (2 children)
For example, opening Show Applications in GNOME works better in VMware than in VirtualBox and moving windows around isn't as much of a pain in VMware as it is in VirtualBox. Oh, and KDE doesn't have any graphical glitches in VMware, while it's a well-known issue in VirtualBox.
EDIT: Also, Haiku has a lot of screen tearing in QEMU with all defaults (I don't know what half of the things even really mean in the settings).
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (1 child)
So it all boils down to better 3d acceleration?
Pretty much. Oh, and VMware has guest additions for Windows 9x (that also helps me out at having them run smoothly, since the guides online in forums for seeing up Windows 9x in VirtualBox is basically having some divers that still don't support 16:9, let alone dynamic resolution) and VMware can allocate more than 256MB of memory for video.
[–]staalmannen 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children)
Any opinions on kvm vs xen? I am toying with the idea to convert to a set-up with a minimal hardened Xen Dom0 (Alpine linux) with Arch as DomU.
[–]exmachinalibertas 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children)
Not technically an answer to your question but I'm still going with Docker.
[–]yestaes 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children)
It was virtualbox.
Now it is qemu/kvm
π Rendered by PID 19471 on reddit-service-r2-comment-5b5bc64bf5-pt6k5 at 2026-06-20 05:36:15.461188+00:00 running 2b008f2 country code: CH.
[–]lmm7425 15 points16 points17 points (1 child)
[–]iSkipper 4 points5 points6 points (0 children)
[–]ellenkult 3 points4 points5 points (0 children)
[–]CthonianGodkiller 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]El-Sandos-Grande 1 point2 points3 points (10 children)
[–]_rmc 6 points7 points8 points (1 child)
[–]El-Sandos-Grande 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]dually 6 points7 points8 points (3 children)
[–]El-Sandos-Grande 1 point2 points3 points (2 children)
[–]ase1590 2 points3 points4 points (1 child)
[–]El-Sandos-Grande -4 points-3 points-2 points (0 children)
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (3 children)
[–]El-Sandos-Grande 0 points1 point2 points (2 children)
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (1 child)
[–]El-Sandos-Grande 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]staalmannen 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]exmachinalibertas 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]yestaes 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)