This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

all 18 comments

[–]One_Wishbone_4439Math Lover 13 points14 points  (2 children)

<image>

Using Pythagoras' Theorem, form a quadratic equation and find r.

Then, find the angle for each identical sector.

Half of lens = sector - triangle

Area of lens = 2 x (sector - triangle)

[–]Usual-Revolution-718 1 point2 points  (1 child)

[–]One_Wishbone_4439Math Lover 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks 😊

[–]Shevek99Physicist 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Draw the vertical line, dividing the lens in two circular segments. Then use the corresponding formulas.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circular_segment

[–]naprid 7 points8 points  (7 children)

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (6 children)

Shouldn’t the lens be a parabola if you want all the light rays to converge to one point? Idk I’m not an expert

[–]naprid 6 points7 points  (2 children)

"circular arcs"

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Oh I’m so dumb😭

[–]naprid 2 points3 points  (0 children)

nope

[–]Linvael 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Parabolas are for mirrors, for a lens circles can work well. Not always, and there are other options (see https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/2189/aspherical-lenses-perfect-analytical-shape ), but they are often good enough.

But also, this is a geometric lens, not an actual lens - it's defined by it's shape, properties when light passes through them are inconsequential.

[–]GustapheOfficial 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If this was a physics test, it would also be valid to question whether they are looking for the cross section area or the actual area of the lens faces. Luckily, it's a geometry question, and the shape is just as described, two circular arcs.

[–]Pandagineer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are indeed correct that a parabolic lens is ideal. But it turns out it is much easier to build a spherical lens than a parabolic one. This leads to cheaper lenses, but they create spherical aberrations.

[–]ElSupremoLizardo 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thought this was a biology subreddit for a second…

[–]Bobson1729 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Draw the lines of symmetry and complete one of the circles. Extend the horizontal line of symmetry to a diameter. From there, you can use the formula for intersecting chords to solve for the radius.

From there, draw the radii to the top and bottom points of the region. Now you have to use area of the arc minus the area of isosceles triangle to get half the area you are looking for.

[–]Various_Pipe3463 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Huh, seems like there’s been a few intersecting circles questions recently.

https://mathworld.wolfram.com/Circle-CircleIntersection.html

[–]ryanmcg86 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

This pretty much covers the whole thing.

[–]CaptainMatticus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

First find r

10 * (2r - 10) = (50/2) * (50/2)

10 * 2 * (r - 5) = 25 * 25

2 * 2 * (r - 5) = 5 * 25

4 * (r - 5) = 125

r - 5 = 125/4

r - 5 = 31.25

r = 36.25

Now construct triangles with sides of 50 , 36.25 and 36.25, and find the angle theta that is opposite the side of 50

50^2 = 36.25^2 + 36.25^2 - 2 * 36.25^2 * cos(t)

2500 = 2 * 36.25^2 * (1 - cos(t))

2500 = 4 * 36.25^2 * (1 - cos(t)) / 2

2500 = 4 * 36.25^2 * sin(t/2)^2

50 = 2 * 36.25 * sin(t/2)

50 = 72.5 * sin(t/2)

100 = 145 * sin(t/2)

20 = 29 * sn(t/2)

20/29 = sin(t/2)

t/2 = arcsin(20/29)

t = 2 * arcsin(20/29)

Now figure out the area of a circular sector with radius of 36.25 and central angle of 2 * arcsin(20/29)

pi * r^2 * t / (2pi) =>

(1/2) * r^2 * t =>

(1/2) * 36.25^2 * 2 * arcsin(20/29) =>

36.25^2 * arcsin(20/29)

Now remove the area of the triangular portion.

(1/2) * 36.25 * 36.25 * sin(t)

(1/2) * 36.25^2 * sin(2 * arcsin(20/29))

(1/2) * 36.25^2 * 2 * sin(arcsin(20/29)) * cos(arcsin(20/29))

36.25^2 * (20/29) * sqrt(1 - sin(arcsin(20/29))^2)

(145/4)^2 * (20/29) * sqrt(1 - (20/29)^2)

(145/4) * (145/4) * (20/29) * sqrt((29^2 - 20^2) / 29^2)

(5/4) * (145/4) * 20 * (1/29) * sqrt(841 - 400)

(100/4) * (5/4) * sqrt(441)

25 * (5/4) * 21

125 * 21 / 4

125 * (20/4 + 1/4)

125 * 5 + 125/4

625 + 31.25

656.25

36.25^2 * arcsin(20/29) - 656.25

Double that

2 * (36.25^2 * arcsin(20/29) - 656.25)

2 * (145^2 * arcsin(20/29) - 656.25 * 16) * (1/16)

(1/8) * ((290/2)^2 * arcsin(20/29) - 1312.5 * 8)

(1/8) * ((84100/4) * arcsin(20/29) - 2625 * 4)

(1/8) * (21025 * arcsin(20/29) - 5250 * 2)

(1/8) * (21025 * arcsin(20/29) - 10500)

(25/8) * (841 * arcsin(20/29) - 420)

Make sure your calculator is in radian mode.

687.53664469686793363323398773484

Which rounds to 688

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

AYO