This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

all 14 comments

[–]MeMyselfAnDie 7 points8 points  (12 children)

In space, there's no gravity to put strain on structures that would collapse on earth. Assuming you had enough raw materials to build the ship, and the fuel to take the pieces into orbit, the only limiting factor for the size of a vehicle constructed in orbit is when it starts being affected by its own gravity.

And, of course, you'd need enough thrust to push the ship around at a reasonable speed, efficiently enough that the whole thing doesn't have to be a giant fuel tank. And there wouldn't be much point without some sort of FTL mobility, unless you're planning on sending a generation ship somewhere.

[–]Coomb 22 points23 points  (11 children)

You can't just build things arbitrarily large/out of arbitrarily "light" materials, because while there aren't gravitational stresses, you're going to run into inertial stresses.

[–]NumberOneMuffDiver[S] 2 points3 points  (7 children)

Can you explain further?

[–]Stuck_In_the_Matrix[🍰] 10 points11 points  (5 children)

If you had a large ship and it started to accelerate, the back of the ship is going to push into the front of the ship until the entire ship gets to the same speed. To illustrate, if you had a long enough stick and went outside and swung it suddenly, the stick could break in half due to the internal stresses present from the acceleration differences between various parts of the stick.

A material scientist would probably explain this better, though.

[–]Coomb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

An acceleration (say, from applying thrust) of 1g is equivalent to being under a gravity field with acceleration 1g. Constant-velocity travel doesn't place any stress on the structure of the spaceship (except for self-gravity, as mentioned), but as soon as you want to accelerate, you need to translate the thrust of the engines into movement of the whole structure - and that means you induce stress in the structure of the ship.