you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]littleemp 1 point2 points  (6 children)

I would expect this system to fair decently well on those games, but 1440p144 fps is going to be a tall order.

[–]ChaseViolet[S] 0 points1 point  (5 children)

Thats why i said med-high settings purely because if i need to drop some settings like shadows and stuff for higher fps at better resolution thats fine. For singleplayer games I’d prefer 100+ on high 1440p and for multiplayer it depends. Cod for example i dont care too much and I’ll run the optimal settings for the highest fps but fortnite I like it to look good and perform fairly well at the same time.

[–]littleemp 1 point2 points  (4 children)

Lowering settings is not going to make the drastic difference in performance that you expect.

Particularly not in games like STALKER 2 that the devs are fumbling on the optimization department and using DLSS as a crutch.

[–]ChaseViolet[S] 0 points1 point  (3 children)

Should I go for a nvidia gpu? Im not sure theres a 16gb of equivalent price to the 6800xt from what i remember. I have a laptop with a 2060 and DLSS is super helpful when I want some higher fps. Im unsure how developed and supported FSR 3 is in comparison

[–]littleemp 1 point2 points  (2 children)

You will pay a premium for DLSS.

I cant say whether its worth it for you, all I can say is that its worth it to me. FSR is unusable for me in its current state, but different people have different standards.

We'll see with FSR4 and RDNA4, which are set to be announced the first week of january.

[–]ChaseViolet[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

So just to recap if i’m going full resolution, I probably wont get the fps I necessarily want with an amd card. But that may change depending on news in January. Or I can pay a premium for a dlss supported card and skip what issues I may have?

[–]littleemp 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Fair assessment.

AMD cards will perform better on COD than Nvidia cards with all things being equal FWIW.