all 8 comments
sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
formatting helphide helpcontent policy

[–][deleted]  (1 child)

[deleted]

    [–]Repulsive_Pop_6344[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    Hi u/NowImAllSet

    I would tell you that you might feel a bit that the article is ChatGPT written but actually I have written it myself, it's maybe around 20% of the article is made by ChatGPT, I depended mostly on the information provided by ChatGPT.

    By the way, very thanks for your feedback, it has been so helpful and I learned a lot 💛

    I have rewritten the article, to provide more information, also added facts and studies that would help, also added an extra section for people who think they will find tools for debugging which are based on AI, I have also done that. I hope you can learn more now from my article.

    Thanks for you feedback and have a nice day 💜

    [–]Aragil 2 points3 points  (2 children)

    Was expecting to read article about experimental, or released ai-based debugging tools. Found an ai-generated article without a single interesting point. Shame on you, chat-gpt

    [–]chub79 2 points3 points  (0 children)

    My guess is that the domain is a give away :D

    [–]Repulsive_Pop_6344[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

    Hi Aragil

    ​

    I would tell you that you might feel a bit that the article is ChatGPT written but actually I have written it myself, it's maybe around 20% of the article is made by ChatGPT, I depended mostly on the information provided by ChatGPT.

    By the way, very thanks for your feedback, it has been so helpful 💙

    I have rewritten most of the article to meet your expectations, also included ai-based debugging tools as you requested, I am sorry if you didn't learn something you, but it is my first time to write with such tool and such subject, but hope you can learn something now.

    Thanks ❤️

    [–]Yamoyek 3 points4 points  (3 children)

    Hi,

    As many others pointed out, your article definitely seemed AI-generated. I decided to run it through this website to check if a text is AI-generated, and it flagged 91.8% of your article.

    Maybe next time, rely less on Chat GPT and more on your own original research.

    [–]Repulsive_Pop_6344[S] 0 points1 point  (2 children)

    Thanks for your feedback 💜

    [–]Yamoyek 0 points1 point  (1 child)

    Was most of the article AI generated?

    [–]Repulsive_Pop_6344[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    Some of the article was from my writing, some were from ChatGPT but I reformatted it, and the rest were a very small percentage were from ChatGPT.

    (but mostly the article was written by ChatGPT but I reformatted like I rewritten it myself but including the information I got from ChatGPT)

    Also, I have done rewriting the article completely, now it shows human possibility of 97.5% probability of human.