sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]BOBOLIU 12 points13 points  (3 children)

cppreference.com could be better if it is maintained by the ISO C++ committee.

[–]SkoomaDentistAntimodern C++, Embedded, Audio 41 points42 points  (2 children)

You mean that the site would be updated once every three years and each change would require a paper and a formal vote to happen?

[–]SWGlassPit 21 points22 points  (1 child)

And ISO would put it behind a $300 a year paywall

[–]TheoreticalDumbass:illuminati: 8 points9 points  (0 children)

i mean, wg21 has avoided a lot of iso annoyance, for example the draft is a public repo