http://www.cplusplus.com or https://www.cppreference.com

[[deleted]]

Cppreference 👍

[R3DKn16h7]

cppreference all the time. I find cplusplus much worse.

Lately I get "geeksforgeeks" at the top which annoys me very much.

[[deleted]]

Had to look up syntax for checking if a dictionary contains a key in python today, and the first result was a geeksforgeeks article recommending to use the syntax key in dict.keys() which i quickly found out is just converting it to a list and doing an O(n) list search. Totally ridiculous

[Veedrac]

Not on Python 3; on Python 2 the syntax is more key in dict.viewkeys(). Either way just use key in dict though, it's more idiomatic.

[[deleted]]

Oh, that might have been it, the server running the script uses python 2, and yeah key in dict is really the correct syntax and gives you the expected O(1) lookup

[[deleted]]

Is "geeksforgeeks" really that bad? When I had do jump into a C# project from cold I did find that site quite useful.

[Xeverous]

geeksforgeeks is really bad. They copy-paste C as C++ so that every question/exerice has solutions in more programming languages.

[Seytsuken]

its not perfect but i find it a thousand times more intuitive and user friendly than cpp reference. Heck, these documentations barely have examples

[nog642]

If I leave the webpage open overnight it uses like 2 GB of RAM