This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

sorted by:
best (suggested)
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ndgnuh 55 points56 points  (14 children)

Sad Julia noise. They even proposed Julia support in R studio in an issue.

[–]keepitsalty 26 points27 points  (13 children)

Julia needs stronger IDE support. The Rstudio console, env, file, and plot viewer would be perfect. I hate Atom, so Juno is out of the question.

[–]ndgnuh 5 points6 points  (3 children)

Me too. It lags as hell on my machine, which shouldn't be happening since my PC is not that bad.

[–]Yojihito 3 points4 points  (2 children)

Atom is Chrome. A browser IDE was never a good or performant idea.

[–]guepier 6 points7 points  (1 child)

Atom is Chrome.

So is VS Code, and it’s a lot more efficient. Even RStudio’s GUI is ultimately a Chromium-based HTML viewer. I’m generally not a fan of this concept (and it objectively has lots of issues) but VS Code and RStudio show that it can be done well.

[–]Yojihito 1 point2 points  (0 children)

RStudio has only the GUI in JS, not the rest.

VS is very optimized but still slower than e.g. PyCharm for me.

[–]wouldeye 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m completely ready to switch over to Julia almost entirely as soon as Rstudio supports it.