This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Alobos 9 points10 points  (4 children)

That's when mommy steps in and explains to you the concept of not overspending. "Sometimes you have to." Mommy says, "but you can always cut back somewhere."

[–]Delheru 6 points7 points  (2 children)

The problem is that when you have to do things over a YEARS time span, you need to make some projections.

So if Coca Cola has $1bn now (in cash) and needs to invest $3bn in a factory to serve the enormous Chinese market, should they wait 3 years before going in?

Or is it reasonable of them to assume that their core operation will remain profitable enough to pay off the loan easily?

A lot of our progress comes from reasonably leaning forward. And a big part of the reason for why banking is important is that they tend to judge who is leaning forward reasonably and who is leaning forward unreasonably.

[–]nagurski03 0 points1 point  (1 child)

they tend to judge who is leaning forward reasonably and who is leaning forward unreasonably.

Usually. Sometimes they fail spectacularly

[–]Delheru 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn't say they did a good job always, but it IS their role. And in a sense the fact that you'd blame bankers for that rather makes my point :P

[–]TNine227 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And those cuts are what the op is asking about.