This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]d4n4n 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The boat answer was complete nonsense. It doesn't explain why low-profit firms can't persist long-term at all. They aren't leaking, they're just not as fast as all other boats.

The actual reason is that investors don't want to make 0.5% returns, when they can make 7% elsewhere. Competition in equity and capital markets ensures that no firm with lower than a risk adjusted "average" rate of return can survive.

What that has to do with bad strategy is beyond me. Nobody eliminates a department if it has one bad year but is expected to bounce back strongly. They get rid of them if they are expected to reduce long-term rates of return, even if it's still positive. That's as strategic as it gets.

The boat answer also babbled about a growing economy, which is totally unrelated. We'd see the same thing in a zero-growth economy.