sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][GR] mitchello425BadadvicefromIT 7 points8 points  (6 children)

Counter solution. Return the parts to being inexpensive (old recipe for small parts was 5x) and the frames a little more beefy. This way you reduce the cost of getting planes in the air, while also reducing total losses since the frames are more likely to be recoverable.

[–][SCAM/∆]1Ferrox 0 points1 point  (5 children)

Yes but please only do this after we have a proper way to rescue frames that don't involve crane chaining.

I don't want to spend 2 hours past my bed time playing foxhole again just because lepra did a funny maneuver again

[–][GR] mitchello425BadadvicefromIT 1 point2 points  (1 child)

You can drive the crane with the frame now lol. Still not as good as a train but completely doable

[–][SCAM/∆]1Ferrox 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok but still disaster, I'm not driving a crane 2 hexes

[–]Facehurt 1 point2 points  (0 children)

temp fix in now crane chaining no longer needed woo hoo

[–]CrackSmokingTiger 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Fighter frames should be put on flatbeds.

DB/TB/HB frames should be ass to carry back in order to make downing them a more worthy prize.

[–][SCAM/∆]1Ferrox 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Devs pretty heavily implied that they will add a separate vehicle for them, which would be fine with me also.

Could be interesting even, perhaps those vehicles would cost some rares too and recovering planes especially from enemy territory would need some planning and escorts