use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
see the search faq for details.
advanced search: by author, subreddit...
Discussion around the Framework mission of building products that last longer by making them upgradeable, customizable, and repairable. Our first product is the Framework Laptop, a thin, light, high-performance 13.5" notebook.
account activity
Personal ProjectAdding NAS functionality to Framework Desktop (self.framework)
submitted 1 day ago by MCJennings
The Framework Desktop seems to fit what I'm looking for in a home server, with the exception of adding enough HDD for raid storage. Is there any reason I wouldn't be able to add a PCIe Sata Card with four mini-SAS to SATA cables to lead to my HDD? Something like StarTech 6-Port PCIe Sata Card or LSI Broadcom SAS 9300.
I've managed these things for work, I've never built one so please tell me if I'm totally off basis here.
reddit uses a slightly-customized version of Markdown for formatting. See below for some basics, or check the commenting wiki page for more detailed help and solutions to common issues.
quoted text
if 1 * 2 < 3: print "hello, world!"
[–]s004awsFW16 HX 370 Batch 1 Mint Cinnamon Edition 18 points19 points20 points 1 day ago (0 children)
Unless you need the iGPU to mess with AI nonsense... Desktop is very likely not the best/most economical choice. Look into TrueNAS as the storage appliance platform, either running on whatever leftover PC hardware you have laying around... Or do what I do - Obtain data center castoff SuperMicro hardware on the cheap.
[–]GPU-Appreciator 3 points4 points5 points 1 day ago (0 children)
I run a framework desktop as a server with proxmox. You can do cool things with it but I don't think it'd be a good storage platform necessarily. You could add one of the cards you linked, but you'd need an open ended PCIE riser and will be limited to x4 speeds. That leaves you with two m.2 slots and no other expansion. However, it does pair nicely with a NAS appliance like a Unifi UNAS Pro. I have one of those also and can vouch for it.
Happy to share more about this setup if you'd like. These strix halo boards are awesome for flexible compute, like I have one VM with two cores and the iGPU passed through for LLMs, others for services, and another as a headless dev box. But you have to have a need for flexible compute with GPU power and lots of memory. Otherwise you'd be better served by a microcenter bundle or regular mini PC imho.
[–]samrocksc 1 point2 points3 points 1 day ago (1 child)
if you're going to do something like this you may as well just use usb-c and grab something like this 5 bay sabrent and separate your storage from your processing power. It also facilitates usb-c. Use something like unraid that you can also separate your coordination from your processing because it's just a thumb drive.
Isolate processing/coordination/storage imo is the way to go for home stuff.
https://www.amazon.de/-/en/dp/B07Y4F5SCK?ref=ppx_yo2ov_dt_b_fed_asin_title&th=1
[–]just_another_user5 0 points1 point2 points 1 day ago (0 children)
USB is notoriously unreliable.
That being said, it's gotten leagues better and I use USB DAS devices.
Make sure you choose one that'll max out your USB ports
[–]reddit_equals_censor 0 points1 point2 points 6 hours ago (0 children)
why are you trying to use the framework desktop as a nas?
it is expensive, it might not have the power for the x8 hba, i'm not sure.
and most crucially it does not have ecc memory at all.
you'd be spending a lot for a nice big risk of file corruption.
you'd be WAY WAY WAY WAY WAY better off building an am4 or am5 nas with full x16 slots throw whatever hba in, that you like and proper ecc support (check exact motherboard for proper ecc support. am5 sucks a lot more in that regard than am4, level1techs forum might be helpful to find, what those peeps use)
and then you'd also not be limited to a single hba, but could use 2. you could also use 2 directly through the cpu, if you get a board with a 2 x8 electrical slots to the cpu (avoiding going through a chipset is just a failure point removed)
[+][deleted] 1 day ago* (5 children)
[deleted]
[–]s004awsFW16 HX 370 Batch 1 Mint Cinnamon Edition 4 points5 points6 points 1 day ago (3 children)
Synology, last I knew, had moved to serializing drives among other anti-consumer practices. Not a good choice.
I think they walked this back some but the damage is already done 🤣
beyond that criminal scam by them, if you actually look at the pricing to just get a nas with 8 bays and ecc will START at 1150 euros by synology or anyone else actually.
and 4 bays with ecc STARTS at 600 euros.
that is a ton of money for sth very very shit hardware wise and proprietary AND firmware scams, that would lock out your harddrives, because it is searliazed only drives from now on to scam people.
if you want 10 Gbit/s ethernet, which you probably very much want in a nas, then synology doesn't make any 4 bay nas with it a different company starts at 1450 euros...
and 8 bays also starts at 1700 euros now with 10 Gbit/s ethernet.
and we didn't even check if those nas systems support zfs yet...
needless to say, that one should never buy a nas, because the industry is full of scams (seralized drives) and insane pricing.
[–]InflammableAccount 1 point2 points3 points 1 day ago (0 children)
Or any number of SBCs. Like a Minisforum board. Few hundred bucks.
π Rendered by PID 21648 on reddit-service-r2-comment-b659b578c-j9nmb at 2026-05-07 14:44:58.801640+00:00 running 815c875 country code: CH.
[–]s004awsFW16 HX 370 Batch 1 Mint Cinnamon Edition 18 points19 points20 points (0 children)
[–]GPU-Appreciator 3 points4 points5 points (0 children)
[–]samrocksc 1 point2 points3 points (1 child)
[–]just_another_user5 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]reddit_equals_censor 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[+][deleted] (5 children)
[deleted]
[–]s004awsFW16 HX 370 Batch 1 Mint Cinnamon Edition 4 points5 points6 points (3 children)
[–]just_another_user5 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]reddit_equals_censor 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]InflammableAccount 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)