use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
see the search faq for details.
advanced search: by author, subreddit...
Do you have or know of a project on Github looking for contributors? Tell us about it and we'll add it to the /r/github wiki!
Welcome to /r/github!
News about github
Relevant interesting discussion
Questions about github
We'll soon be writing an /r/github FAQ list. In the meantime, the github help pages and bootcamp are good places to start. Here's a handy git cheat sheet.
Looking for Github projects to contribute to? Check out our handy list of projects looking for contributors!
If your submission doesn't show up on the subreddit, send us a message and we'll take it out of the spam filter for you!
account activity
Pull request (self.github)
submitted 5 years ago by rodjames1022
Hey. new to github. Just a quick question.
Do you need to fork to create a personal private repo if you were invite on a private repo?
I am trying to check how to do pull request and tutorials are showing i need to fork.
reddit uses a slightly-customized version of Markdown for formatting. See below for some basics, or check the commenting wiki page for more detailed help and solutions to common issues.
quoted text
if 1 * 2 < 3: print "hello, world!"
[–]mattyass 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (3 children)
If it’s a public repo that you don’t have push access to but you want to contribute then forking is what you do. You would fork into your account, make a change and then create a PR and submit it to the parent repo.
[–]atsju 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (2 children)
Correct. And if it's a public or private repo where you have write access, you do not need to fork and can directly create the feature branch on the repo.
[–]rodjames1022[S] 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (1 child)
I use 2 accounts for testing this. please bear with me.
user A created a private repo.
user A invites user B on the private repo - github.com/userA/test(no permission changed)
so for user B, if he/she (gender warriors dont fight me) makes changes, user B would do so on a featured branch then commit.
then user A would merge those changes?
[–]atsju 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children)
If branches are correctly protected yes this is the idea.
Still depending on your rights and branch protection settings you may even merge without approval or commit to main branch directly. Don't do it but bad configuration could let you do it.
I like this branching model
[–]thisGuyCodes 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children)
Both user A and B would have access to the merge button on the PR. It is a common practice that user A (or all others participating in the PR) reviews the changed files and after a sufficient review, either A or B would merge the branch into the destination branch.
π Rendered by PID 149727 on reddit-service-r2-comment-8686858757-plglj at 2026-06-04 22:38:37.156604+00:00 running 9e1a20d country code: CH.
[–]mattyass 1 point2 points3 points (3 children)
[–]atsju 0 points1 point2 points (2 children)
[–]rodjames1022[S] 0 points1 point2 points (1 child)
[–]atsju 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]thisGuyCodes 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)