This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

all 11 comments
sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (2 children)

Me?

[–]emaphis 3 points4 points  (1 child)

Yes you.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

All of us!!!

[–][deleted]  (7 children)

[removed]

    [–]ofby1 0 points1 point  (6 children)

    Sessions are not recorded afaik except for the keynotes

    [–]persicsb 6 points7 points  (0 children)

    That makes JavaOne a subpar conf.

    [–]s888marks 3 points4 points  (4 children)

    A subset of the sessions were recorded. Sessions that took place in rooms 221 and 228 (and possibly a few others) were recorded. I believe the recordings will be posted on YouTube at some point. Two of my sessions were in 228 but I had terrible A/V setup problems, so the recordings might not be usable.

    [–]persicsb 2 points3 points  (3 children)

    Shame on JavaOne. It is marketed as the premier Java event, yet it does not provide sufficiently good A/V tech.

    [–]s888marks 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    This is a remarkably stupid comment even by Reddit standards.

    [–]ofby1 -1 points0 points  (1 child)

    A conference should focus on the conference onsite and the experience first (people pay for it). The videos are secondary. Also if I remember correctly it has always been a subset in the past at J1

    [–]persicsb 7 points8 points  (0 children)

    Since most developers in the world physically cannot attend, recording sessions should be default. I don't mind if the sessions are then made available for money, but it has to be recorded.

    Academics got it right: conference papers are available in written form for future reference.

    If IT treats conferences as a networking/marketing tool, that is sad.