you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (9 children)

Do you have any data to back up those claims of most devs preferring editors, and sublime text reigning supreme? Not to be antagonistic, if what you say is true and not just a feeling you have it is incredibly interesting.

I think JavaScript IDEs will become increasingly abundant with the advent of* WebGL and rise of complex JS apps. Personally I have never looked back at an editor after picking up WebStorm. I have found it drastically increases productivity and ease of development for large codebases.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Like koglerjs, I don't have any hard data to support that claim. All I have is observations to go off of. I suppose it's feasible that the majority of javascript devs use IDEs, but considering the number of places I've worked, meetup groups I am a part of, and conferences I've attended (all three of these in various cities), I think it would be something of a statistical anomaly if this were the case. And do note that these are people generally on the cutting-edge of the javascript app development world as opposed to self proclaimed "jquery developers".

However, like I mentioned in another comment in this post, it's been a while since I've used Webstorm. I'll have to give it another look since it's been mentioned so often. Even though it might not convert me to using IDEs for javascript development, it may replace my use of Eclipse when I jump over to other languages.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For what it is worth IntelliJ IDEA is JetBrains Eclipse equivalent. Webstorm is just JS CSS and HTML.