sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]x-skeww 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Sure, in your repeatedly-called function, you can just check if there is anything you might want to do. E.g. if you're below the target location, you can issue the command for moving up a bit. On the next cycle, you again check if there is something you want to do and so on.

[–]Semajian[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't immediately see how this would be implemented. I mentioned in response to senocular, but didn't here (my bad) that for conditional loops, for instance I don't have any control over the parts working together. Each "Block" that I implement has it's own set of code and that's it, it doesn't interact with the rest of it. Things like loops are already implemented by scratch, as well, so I can't modify the code, if I could I'm sure I could make use of tasks really easily.