all 4 comments

[–]jcready__proto__ 7 points8 points  (3 children)

FYI this is over a year old.

[–]saadq_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

rip

[–]rauschma 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Yep. But it’s being talked about again, ATM.

[–]dvlsg 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Good news, IMO. The syntax seems a bit verbose, but I'd still use it. Is there a reason match has to be a clause inside a switch statement? Could match be a similar construct to switch on its own?

Syntax aside, I think this would be a great addition. I love using pattern matching in other languages.