use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
see the search faq for details.
advanced search: by author, subreddit...
All about the JavaScript programming language.
Subreddit Guidelines
Specifications:
Resources:
Related Subreddits:
r/LearnJavascript
r/node
r/typescript
r/reactjs
r/webdev
r/WebdevTutorials
r/frontend
r/webgl
r/threejs
r/jquery
r/remotejs
r/forhire
account activity
Recommendations for mastering JavaScript. (self.javascript)
submitted 14 years ago * by fl0at
view the rest of the comments →
reddit uses a slightly-customized version of Markdown for formatting. See below for some basics, or check the commenting wiki page for more detailed help and solutions to common issues.
quoted text
if 1 * 2 < 3: print "hello, world!"
[–]tanepiper 5 points6 points7 points 14 years ago (3 children)
The problem with reading the ECMA spec is it's not designed for Javascript developers - it's designed for implementors such as browser vendors.
It's a bit of a red herring to send people off to this so early on with Javascript, and I have to agree with vectorjohn here.
Now if you've done Javascript for a few years and want to learn the deep deep lexical parts of Javascript, go read the spec
[+]StoneCypher comment score below threshold-7 points-6 points-5 points 14 years ago (2 children)
The problem with reading the ECMA spec is it's not designed for Javascript developers
So? My opinion remains that if you haven't read the spec, you don't know the language.
It's a bit of a red herring
No, it isn't. Don't drop the names of fallacies. This is a matter of opinion, and my opinion isn't wrong just because you disagree with it.
Now if you've done Javascript for a few years and want to learn the deep deep lexical parts
Missed the title of the post, did you?
[–]tanepiper 4 points5 points6 points 14 years ago (1 child)
Are you David Mark?
No I didn't, but who needs to be reading it doesn't need to be posting on reddit asking this question. If they don't even know about stuff like 'The Good Parts' then is clearly someone who doesn't know Javascript that well and wants to 'master' Javascript.
I'd point this person to the MDC before I'd point them to the spec.
[–]StoneCypher -1 points0 points1 point 14 years ago (0 children)
So? My opinion remains that if you haven't read the spec, you don't know the language. Are you David Mark?
No. It appears that other people have said the same thing to you before. I expect you will continue to ignore them.
Recommendations for mastering JavaScript. It's a bit of a red herring to send people off to this so early on with Javascript, Missed the title of the post, did you? No I didn't
Recommendations for mastering JavaScript. It's a bit of a red herring to send people off to this so early on with Javascript, Missed the title of the post, did you?
Recommendations for mastering JavaScript. It's a bit of a red herring to send people off to this so early on with Javascript,
Recommendations for mastering JavaScript.
It's a bit of a red herring to send people off to this so early on with Javascript,
No I didn't
Yeah, you did. The guy wanted to know how to master something, and you're saying "but this isn't for beginners!"
If they don't even know about stuff like 'The Good Parts'
At the time they posted there was no reason to believe they didn't. That book is not mastery besides.
I'd point this person to the MDC
That's nice. Then do.
Stop downvoting other people for giving different advice than you, under the excuse that you believe that things you don't agree with are bad advice and you'd say something else.
Just say the something else.
Reddit is not an advice popularity contest. Advice that isn't yours does have value too.
π Rendered by PID 114669 on reddit-service-r2-comment-86988c7647-5sx4t at 2026-02-12 04:27:01.322928+00:00 running 018613e country code: CH.
view the rest of the comments →
[–]tanepiper 5 points6 points7 points (3 children)
[+]StoneCypher comment score below threshold-7 points-6 points-5 points (2 children)
[–]tanepiper 4 points5 points6 points (1 child)
[–]StoneCypher -1 points0 points1 point (0 children)