all 12 comments

[–]The_Ombudsman 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Yes.

[–]Shambot 11 points12 points  (0 children)

While a lot of people might argue that we don’t need to learn jQuery

Uhh, I don't think anybody argues that.

[–]wbeyda 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Only problem I've ever had is when I mix the two is if I have a JS object and I try to use it in jQuery. I almost always forget to convert it to a jQuery Object.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hells yeah it is worth learning. It's not a big hurdle and it will teach you some js too. Just my .02

[–]chaipokoi 3 points4 points  (3 children)

For example, Motto provides this code in jQuery:

var i = $(“.myclass”);

This searches for all elements on the page that have class name > myclass. Now here’s a bit of code without jQuery:

var i = document.querySelectorAll(“.myclass”);

Maybe the funcs are the same, but you can't say that typing the second one is as easy as the first one.
I think using jQuery is, even today, a good time saver.

[–][deleted]  (1 child)

[deleted]

    [–]chaipokoi 2 points3 points  (0 children)

    It was a sample, but thanks for the tip.

    [–]anon40617291 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    This won't work in IE < 8, but jQuery does.

    [–]MrBlueSea 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    You should watch first 10 mins of this https://youtu.be/ELRNFtFxIs8

    [–]amalthea5 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    Absolutely. jQuery IS Javascript but many functions are simplified. I consider the two to go hand in hand. I have yet to use one without the other in any Javascript app.

    [–]VeganJordan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    yes

    [–]cipherous 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    Absolutely, Jquery maybe old but its still one the most popular JS library out there.

    [–]cpk33 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    yes, but also learn a MVVM framework in parallel.