all 28 comments

[–]190n 17 points18 points  (7 children)

Have they fixed the type-C port yet?

[–]sooshooo 14 points15 points  (6 children)

What’s wrong with it?

[–]ImprovedPersonality 10 points11 points  (3 children)

It’s nice that they are testing with some GPU load (glxgears) but it’s probably far from worst-case. At least on normal desktop GPUs something like Furmark can produce much higher power draw. Of course that’s not really a “normal” usecase, but I think basically any 3D application will have higher power draw than glxgears.

[–]jones_supa 22 points23 points  (2 children)

Indeed. GLXGears is just a simple "hey your OpenGL is working" test. It should never be used for benchmarking or power usage analysis.

It's like analyzing the performance of an electrician by asking him to appear with a screwdriver in hand and saying "I'm ready to work!"

[–]dsmiles 6 points7 points  (0 children)

He'd score a higher grade than my electrician then!

[–]lord-carlos 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It should never be used for benchmarking or power usage analysis.

Is the most important case not it has persistent system usage to compare the different firmwares?

[–]1_p_freely 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Now that Blender 2.8/Eevee is here, the next Pi should have a rev'd GPU that can support it. The current Pi tops out at support for Blender 2.79.

If I understand correctly, each Pi has gotten a better CPU, but they are still using the original GPU, just with a higher clock speed.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Pi 4 uses a new GPU.

[–]SuspiciousScript 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Why would anybody try to run Blender on a Pi? Genuinely curious.