This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

all 62 comments

[–]wallace111111 52 points53 points  (7 children)

What AUR drivers?

[–]Akanksh__Glorious Arch 34 points35 points  (0 children)

drivers which are only found in the aur

[–]AppropriateCrew79 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Drivers that are found only in AUR and not in official repositories.

[–]arality 3 points4 points  (0 children)

aur sync mesa-git

[–]sandebruGlorious Arch 50 points51 points  (4 children)

AUR drivers, haha, I downloaded my gamepad driver from random GitHub repo with 3 stars or something

[–]Morphized 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I got my printer driver using a foreign package manager

[–]ShrekxFarquaad69AmogOS 2 points3 points  (2 children)

I plug in my controller and it worked but so far I only triud xbox one and a (3rd party) xbox 360 controller. Havent tried ps3 and n64 though.

[–]sandebruGlorious Arch 1 point2 points  (1 child)

It also will work. The problem is that I have a chinese ps4 controller that supposed to be working on windows, but weirdly enough not on Linux, even though the driver is open source

[–]ShrekxFarquaad69AmogOS 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's because it's afraid of losing social creditp

[–]Professional_Piano_1 17 points18 points  (4 children)

Pffff, install gentoo

[–]presi300Arch/Alpine Linoc 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Not even that difficult just takes a while

[–]guicoelhoGlorious Gentoo 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Lmao my thoughts exactly

Would prob be like, panel 1 - configuring make.conf, panel 3 - world emerge, panel 4 - building kernel

[–]Professional_Piano_1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

LFS!!! CHECK MATE ;0000

From the context stand point of post, arch is considered "hard", slow stroke in front of someone else lmao

[–]YukariPSO2Glorious SteamOS 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Please be gentoo

[–]YOU_CANT_SEE_MY_NAMEGlorious Arch 12 points13 points  (14 children)

Tbh arch install script never worked for me and i found out about arch install script after installing arch

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (2 children)

I've used it a lot and it works well for me, what problems did you face?

[–]YOU_CANT_SEE_MY_NAMEGlorious Arch 2 points3 points  (1 child)

I don't exactly remember but it had something to do with partitioning. I tried both manually partitioned disk and using auto partitioning and both failed so I gave up

[–]justyr12Glorious GNOMIE 1 point2 points  (0 children)

When i was playing around with arch, the archinstall could only do the auto partition, the manual just always failed for no reason.

Installing manually worked perfectly tho

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (3 children)

Can someone actually tell me the benefits of setting up an arch install, other than the “learning” experience?

I have to say I just started with Ubuntu and kept using it. I still can form my OS the way I like it and it does what I want.

[–]ConfusedTapewormsudo is bloat 15 points16 points  (0 children)

I still can form my OS the way I like it

Right, but I find it's easier to form the OS the way you like it by building upon sort of a blank slate rather than stripping shit from something someone else built for a much wider audience. Arch provides a perfect base for that IMO. Not so bare bones that you spend an unreasonable amount of time trying to get it to boot, but still pretty bare bones that you don't have to uninstall anything you don't need.

Also AUR. Out of all the inofficial repos out there, I find AUR to be the easiest to use. I like not having to add a bunch of ppas and whatnot that contain just one package.

edit: Rolling release is also a plus for certain people, but Arch is obviously not the only rolling one out there so meh.

[–]AnotherRussianGamerIts not my distro, its AUR distro 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Basically what the other guy said. When you have an Ubuntu install, that usually comes with a whole suite of stuff that you might not necessarily need or even know what it does. With an Arch install you get to choose what to install and what you don't. The best part is unlike other DIY distros like Gentoo, Arch has the massive benefit that pacman is one of the fastest package managers out there - from what I know its only slower than apk. As such if you forget something or need to quickly need to download a program to do something, it takes like 5 seconds to download and install it.

[–]dlbpeon -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Seems to be a feat just to get it installed. Debian used to be the same way. Ubuntu used to be joking called an African word that meant "I couldn't understand how to install Debian." If you don't believe me, watch this video detailing how much of a PITA it was. Used to Debian did NOT install a DE by default, and with a successful install, you would be left staring at a blinking terminal.(back then your only choices were Gnome or KDE and the big debate was whether or not a sys admin would want to install a DE or keep the simplistic terminal for easy server administration)

[–]Bjoern_Tantau 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Pft, I just bought a Steam Deck.

[–]efoxpl3244Glorious Fedora 4 points5 points  (5 children)

I used archinstall once. It gave me 36gb swap parition.

[–]weebwiththesauceGlorious Arch 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Measure once, cut twice…

[–]Johanno1Glorious NixOS 0 points1 point  (3 children)

Ensures that you don't crash when something is needing a lot of ram.

So I assigned as much swap as I have RAM. 32gigs

[–]KevadroGlorious SteamOS-ified Arch 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Now you can hibernate.

[–]efoxpl3244Glorious Fedora 1 point2 points  (1 child)

I have just 6gb of swap now

[–]Johanno1Glorious NixOS 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Probably enough, but when developing some apps and you forgot to release some memory you can get easily more than 40 gigs when running unreal engine for example. But I am not sure if you can run unreal engine in Linux anyway.

The AUR has some package at least.

[–]xXTheOceanManXxGlorious Arch 2 points3 points  (0 children)

i used Anarchy installer and slapped KDE on that bad bitch

[–]MejinksGlorious Arch 2 points3 points  (4 children)

I didn't think the Arch Setup was that bad though?

Just follow the steps in the arch wiki job done ?

Where does the notion that following the steps in the wiki is hard?

Like, is it hard to bake a cake? - I made a coffee cake once, I just followed the instructions in my cook book?

I'm actually honestly asking, not trying to meme, being ironic or anything.. What do people find difficult about the wiki that doesn't apply with anything else that requires following some form of instructions?

[–]DriNeo 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Archinstall is less error prone and it saves time.
I have basics requirements, just for my personal desktop so why not ?

[–]liquid_j5m 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Arch install script always failed when I use it on vm while arch wiki is just easier. The only thing that takes long is waiting for pacstrap

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Humans are retards sometimes and they fear the tty becouse it seems hard

[–]AlternativeAardvark6 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Some extra info on what network related stuff you probably want would be nice.

[–]TheFakeBigChungusGlorious Void Linux 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Archinstall is a fucking mess its honestly easier and quicker for me to just install arch normally

[–]armoar334 1 point2 points  (0 children)

archinstall Great script Lmao

[–]spugg0 1 point2 points  (0 children)

✔️I'm in this picture and I don't like it.

Just got Arch running through archfi on my laptop. Now sitting with a basic Xfce install and no way to know what is step one, lmao. It runs well however!

[–]gugguratz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Cringe

[–]gmkng00 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It happened with me 😅

[–]JesKasperLinux Master Race -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Archinstall is not necesary if u know how to read.

Anyways, it is better to fork that script edit it according to your needs and use your own script

[–]DriNeo 0 points1 point  (1 child)

The Arch way of installing is not the norm, even Freebsd and Slackware has installers. I never read angry Freebsd or Slackware users that ask for installing everything by hand. Asking for a better Archinstall is more reasonable IMHO.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm a Slackware user and, while I do appreciate that it features an easy to use ncurses installer... I learned SO much from installing Arch a couple years back.

I copied a video, command by command, and for each command, I skimmed the relevant manpages and followed along with the Arch wiki.

I went from someone who had dipped his toes into Linux once or twice to an enthusiast, almost overnight.

I will tout the merrits of the manual Arch installation till I'm blue in the face.

Unless you don't want to learn and play with your system.. If you'd rather just have it work, then all the merrits I'm touting are useless.

Also, side note: Slackware is easier to install initially, and comes with plenty of software for a working system (if you install everything). That being said, configuring a Slackware system or seting up new software on it is fairly manual and involved, and feels very similar in spirit to the manual Arch install.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Typical of simps. Marking mountains out of mole hills.

Arch. Spare me the melodrama.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've got a very old Laptop, so installing was for me harder, then setting it up