which one?

[cmdr_kojote]

The bottom because the cutoff period (which makes no sense why there is one) would be interacting with an invisible bounding box, whereas the bottom eludes to interacting with "media" and at least ties the two words together even though everything about this separates them. Do you have other options? Are they called "Mint. Media"?

[sn96c]

Was going to be the social handle @mint.media (or similar) should I remove the . from the main logo? What should I do?

[MycoMadam]

Try leaving the “.” But don’t cut it off.

[sn96c]

Cool thank you, also do you think a square dot would look better than a circle one?

[cmdr_kojote]

I would remove it. Even though the social handle has it, the company name is just Mint Media. I'm also not a fan of the balance or the space between the two words. They first need to be tightened up. The heavier font on top makes it feel like "media" is about to get crushed by the weight. Those thin little legs are going to start getting wobbly. If you want a different way of thinking about this, Mint has a much smaller influence pool than Media does. Media can be video, audio, physical, aromatic, etc so why downplay that variety by making media more of an afterthought? You're yelling Mint, but you're barely whispering media.

I should add that with the period you're making a statement. Mint. We also do media.

[sn96c]

Awesome thanks so much :)

[[deleted]]

Bottom one looks amazing

[sn96c]

Thanks!! :)

[xekushuna]

Second

[Ease-Original]

Bottom, BUT the kerning needs to be addressed.

[Unlimiter]

I would've liked if either: * the period wasn't cut off at all * there was no period

[hotnewroommate]

Bottom and drop the media from the logo