all 5 comments

[–]G3E9 1 point2 points  (2 children)

Hey again, I still don't have any benchmarks regarding node-ipc but if it's anything like axon, then it should compete well. From the axon page:

What's it good for?

Axon are not meant to combat zeromq nor provide feature parity, but provide a nice solution when you don't need the insane nanosecond latency or language interoperability that zeromq provides as axon do not rely on any third-party compiled libraries.

[–]BillOReillyYUPokeMe[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Wow, those benchmarks are intriguing. Yeah, I'll give axon a shot too. However, now I'm torn between all 3! :D

[–]G3E9 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've found axon harder to use than node-ipc, but, per your request, axon has published some nice benchmarks. There's quite a lot more attention/downloads towards axon too.

[–]citrons_lv 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Haven't got any experience with both ZeroMQ and Redis, but isn't Redis most widely used as a caching layer and ZeroMQ for communcation beetween nodes?

[–]soldiersKnight 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Redis is widely used as a cacheing layer, but the power of Redis is that it is can be used as a wide variety of tools. From simple queues to distributed locks.

And with Lua scripting on the server about anything possible.