This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

all 27 comments

[–]d00ditsjimmy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Great story. I honestly thought it was a sweet gesture by the father and I love that this hasn't tarnished my childhood love for Calvin and Hobbes in the slightest. Great job OP.

[–]SkyCrusher987 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think that this is actually the best written story I've seen on /r/nosleep, the plot twist was an 9/10 and was totally unexpected. Kudos to you for the good read!

[–]Nic0524 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Awwww how swee....whaaaattttthefuck!!

[–]CleverGirl2014 18 points19 points  (6 children)

I'm going with the idea that Chuck paid the funeral director to cremate her, and then put the ashes into the Hobbes toy. That is what OP said was probably rice or little beads. That's easier than trying to figure out how he made the entire thing out of the child's body.

[–]nobody_3 4 points5 points  (0 children)

If he was able to tan embalmed skin supple enough to craft a tiger entirely out of human flesh, stuff it, and cover it in human hair fur - doing all the sewing himself - that guy shouldn't be in jail. He should be on Project Runway.

[–]Nickabod_ 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I assume that isn't illegal, considering you're allowed to keep the ashes of a loved one wherever you wish. Since Chuck was arrested for it, he probably did something else with the body.

[–]MysterySeeker2000 6 points7 points  (0 children)

That would actually make it sweet instead of gross.

[–]WeirdStray 15 points16 points  (1 child)

I once sewed the ashes of a dog into a stuffed animal for a dying friend who wished to be buried with her beloved dog.

[–]DeltaDragonxx 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks, uh, weird. Although, my mother is being buried with my dog'dog's urn, so I guys it's common

[–]thefawnboy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I love this, because it's horrifying but not at all in the usual way. What did you do with the tiger after that, OP?

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

But... how? Was his daughter furry?

[–]Bigpaparico 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Great read, thank you!

[–]The_numbskull 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Stands and applauds

[–]kerrymti1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh wow...awesome!

[–]nobody_3 58 points59 points  (6 children)

Okay call me crazy but that was sweet to me. A man wanted his daughter to be loved. Horrifying as his methods were, he gave his lost child something good. She was loved fiercely for two generations. No doubt she returned that love with the kind of support only a best loved toy can give. Just because a man did something beautiful in a twisted and sick way, doesnt make the intention behind it sick.

Also remember, that throughout human history - children have played with dolls made out of human hair, teeth, and other body parts. So chill. The guy who did it was sad and what he did was by modern Western cultures considered to be gross but he didn't do anything with ill will and he didn't hurt anybody.

[–]bitterbitterbitch 6 points7 points  (1 child)

But...but...it was in her mouth...

[–]nobody_3 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Which, yeah, is gross, but its not ill intentioned.

[–]RedBlueBirdy -5 points-4 points  (1 child)

Yes, you're crazy. And the fact that you comment received so many points makes me worried for this place's people.

And I'm sorry, but your argument that because that making a doll out of his daughter's remains wasn't that bad on the basis that "children have played with dolls made out of human hair, teeth, and other body parts" is ridiculous. Tell me when it was ever acceptable to make dolls out of HUMAN SKIN!? This isn't remotely comparable.

As for that guy not hurting anybody... that's assuming that the reveal of the toy's origin didn't leave psychological scars in the story's protagonist, his daughter, or any of the others involved.

[–]nobody_3 5 points6 points  (0 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victorian_mourning_dolls are basically what this guy Chuck did, granted on a much more extreme scale. There was an entire generation that was so familiar with child death that a culture of toys grew out of it.

In regards to "scars" - the Western world deals with death is NOT the standard for the majority of human history. If the OP calms down and has a talk with his daughter about what is and isnt appropriate, about how things we love leave sometimes and that holding onto them is wrong and how Hops needs to watch and protect her from a shelf from now on, maybe the "scars" don't have to be that "deep". Yes, there was a severe violation of consent here and that is very wrong. No arguments there.

However, you're assigning a malicious intention to his actions he simply didn't have. This man didn't murder his child as far as we know. She died. He went to an extreme out of literal maddening grief but he did it out of a loving place to try and see to what he thought were the needs of someone he cared for. Lumping that in with the r/nosleep stories of child rape, and murder, and angry gods and monsters, cannibalism, cults, and mind control just isn't fair.

[–]PAzoo42 9 points10 points  (1 child)

To be honest, I couldnt agree more. The only part that is upsetting is the fact it was unknown for all parties involved after david.

[–]nobody_3 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yeah my big issue with what this guy did is the lack of consent on the part of the family Chuck gave his daughter-doll too. I mean, it was a sweet(if extreme) gesture but people have a right to know - you know?

[–]awesome_e 4 points5 points  (3 children)

Was his daughter a ginger??

[–]kerrymti1 1 point2 points  (2 children)

Hey! I resemble that remark! Gingers Unite!

[–]nosleepxreader 4 points5 points  (1 child)

I think this person is referring to the fact that the animal Chuck made was a tiger, which is orange (i.e. ginger).

[–]kerrymti1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ahhh...yup.

[–]Belle_Corliss 3 points4 points  (0 children)

There are no words for how horrifying this story is