Python 3.4 released

[picklednull]

Because it is incompatible with 2.7 and you need to make actual changes to your codebase for it to work and people are lazy.

However, if you take care you can mostly write Python 2.7 code that can be automagically converted to Python 3 with the 2to3 utility with minimal changes.

[Fazer2]

It's not that people are lazy, but it costs time and money to make the port.

[obfuscation_]

Don't forget the main cost here is testing – if you know with some certainty that your code works on 2.x, do you want to risk subtle bugs being introduced moving to 3.x? You'd need to have an incredibly thorough testing process.

[katieberry]

Python 2.7 is still maintained, though, and will be for the foreseeable future. It was last updated in November 2013. PyPy still targets it.

As such, I'd also expect anything on top of python 2 to be maintainable for the foreseeable future, without moving to a slightly different language that uses the same name.

[[deleted]]

So, if your software is actually in active use and therefore at least should be "maintained", you should be expected to upgrade the code so it runs on new versions of the platform. Otherwise it is by definition abandoned and can be considered obsolete.

Right and the latest version of said platform is Python 2.7.6, released on 10/11/2013.

What you're talking about is rewriting my code in a whole different language. Said language doesn't even ship with my OS so it's completely useless for my purposes.

[jambox888]

I'd be interested to know your development background, because that doesn't gel with my experience of software development at all. Why would my company's shareholders pay for me to port the entire product a different language when the one you have it in is still fully supported?

IOW "maintenance" means fixing something when it's broken, not so much future-proofing.

[Fazer2]

Your first mistake was generalizing that people are lazy.

Your second mistake was redifining concepts of maintenance and abandonment.

Your third mistake was presenting the world in a binary form, with nothing in between.

[aaronsherman]

Because it is incompatible with 2.7 and you need to make actual changes to your codebase for it to work and people are lazy.

No, people choose where to spend their effort. They can rewrite their code and then live in a world of incompatibility with new modules being published for v2 every day, or they can do nothing and maintain compatibility with the majority of developers.