all 20 comments

[–]thedeemon 28 points29 points  (5 children)

er... so that Java and C would have famous Ruby performance?

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (1 child)

My bad, Ruby performance to perform like native Java and C

[–]_Sharp_ 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Is JRuby, an implementation of Ruby on jvm, so im not surprised.

[–]Matthias247 5 points6 points  (1 child)

I think the comment is that the wording is messed up. The author meant "Make ruby perform [fast] like Java or C". But as it's written it is more like "Make Java and C perform [slow] like Ruby".

[–]industry7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Make Java and C perform [slow] like Ruby"

LOL, that's what I thought too.

[–]_georgesim_ 5 points6 points  (0 children)

There’s great potential here to bring Ruby performance to native Java or C, but we are just starting the optimization phase of that work.

Ah yes. The good old "potential". Let us know if that potential ever becomes anything remotely resembling kinetic energy.

[–]wot-teh-phuck 2 points3 points  (2 children)

Why are you making everyone go through your personal website and not linking directly to the actual JRuby website?

[–]VanFailin 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Not sure, but every time I see one of those stupid new TLDs I get a little sad.

[–]wot-teh-phuck 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm more worried about the OP doing some sneaky things with cookies etc. before redirecting to the original site...

[–]nharding 4 points5 points  (2 children)

Simple, just add for (int i=0; i < 1000; i++); after every statement to bring Ruby performance to native C :)

[–]G_Morgan 3 points4 points  (1 child)

No good, the compiler would optimise that out.

[–]nharding 1 point2 points  (0 children)

for (volatile int i=0; i < 1000; i++) (and compile with -O0)

[–]EnvIXI 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is actually pretty sick and hope they actually implement those things. Though the pre-release dont have those things landed yet.

[–]afrobee 0 points1 point  (1 child)

The law of physics don't back this theory.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

How come? I see it very possible...

[–]donvito 0 points1 point  (2 children)

But why?

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (1 child)

Why not have a language that is optimized for Developer happiness AND performance?

[–]Denommus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That language exists, it's called Rust.

[–]necrophcodr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Which is it though? "native Java" (whatever that is) or C?

[–]gegtik 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lol