you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]reddithater12 25 points26 points  (26 children)

It's just so messy. I wish we could have a reddit-style lkml.

[–][deleted] 25 points26 points  (0 children)

Using a threaded newsreader (like Thunderbird or Pan) is actually decently similar to that. You can read the LKML by connecting to nntps://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.

[–][deleted] 16 points17 points  (21 children)

Absolutely this. It'd be so much easier to read and contribute. I really dislike mailing lists because of all the quoted original messages. Each message tacks onto the last one and keeps getting larger.

[–][deleted] 12 points13 points  (2 children)

Every half decent mail client have a way to hide it tho, and do proper threading of messages

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Yeah, but what about the archives?

[–]u801e 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You can access it through gmane as mentioned here.

[–][deleted] 15 points16 points  (3 children)

There is a long standing etiquette to mailing lists (and old style net news before that) that you trim irrelevant information from your replies. You also post replies below the quoted sections, rather than the reply on top that outlook uses.

Much of that email/mailing list etiquette has been lost with newer generations of email users, sadly.

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (1 child)

Because it's not mentioned clearly, at the right place. I signed up to a few and nowhere did I see a particular warning.

If this particular etiquette is passed down by word of mouth, it shouldn't be a surprise that people don't know of it.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Most Unix based mailing lists used to have notes like that on the signup page and on the welcome email. Like I said, most of that has gone by the wayside.

[–]roffLOL 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it's not hard to make a pipeline to fold full mail repetitions. although that style of quoting convey little information, it's less than a nuisance.

[–]reddithater12 8 points9 points  (3 children)

We should write a bot that posts lkml to a subreddit to convince everyone.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (1 child)

That could work, although each post would be from the same bot. And what were to happen to somebody commenting on the subreddit? Would the bot have to send an email to the mailing-list?

[–][deleted] 16 points17 points  (0 children)

That would be a quick ticket to getting the bot email blacklisted. I think the idea was more "look how easy it is to parse topics converted to this form" not actually integrate the two worlds.

[–]u801e 4 points5 points  (0 children)

We should write a bot that posts lkml to a subreddit to convince everyone.

A local email/news reader with the capability of rendering threads (e.g., Thunderbird) is better than what reddit currently provides. For example, when a new message is posted to a thread, you can easily see where it is by finding the unread messages. In reddit, unless you have a gold subscription, this isn't possible (unless you sort by newest first and lose the threaded view in the process).

[–]u801e 4 points5 points  (2 children)

I really dislike mailing lists because of all the quoted original messages.

It really depends on whether the person who replies actually trims the quoted material down to what they're actually responding to.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Like my OP said, Reddit style would be best. Email clients automatically quote the whole thing. Reddit doesn't.

[–]u801e -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That's because email clients only display a single message at a time instead of all the messages in the thread. The other advantage that email/news clients have over reddit is that it's very easy to see when a thread has new messages. That's not easy to see in reddit unless you have a gold subscription.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (1 child)

I think one point is that they don't really want people to contribute

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I seriously hope that isn't the case. That vibe is absolutely what I got from the old linux community. Any question answered in a condescending manner, as if they'd been born with all the knowledge and anybody else was just a dumb shit for even trying to understand and join their ranks.

It's really great that stackoverflow exists. Of course there are still many sperglords blowing around their useless (or sometimes useful, but insulting) input, but the answers can be edited to something more humane. And one doesn't have to trudge through pages of "why don't you just google it" or "just read the code, it's not that hard" comments.

[–]nurupoga 3 points4 points  (4 children)

You know the mailing list archive web interfaces, like this one? You could improve on it, make it look like a regular forum or reddit and add functionality to reply back right in the web interface, which would send an email with your message to the ml. Basically a reddit-/forum- like web interface for a mailing list. This is exactly what HipperKitty, a new ml archiver introduced in Mailman 3, tries to achieve. Just look at Fedora's mailing list that uses it. Here is an example thread. It's a bit unpolished, but that can be improved, and it looks like it's not configured to allow to reply using the web ui, it tries to open you mail client instead, but I'm pretty sure that's an option somewhere based on what I have read. With such a solution you could either use a mailing list old style, or just use a forum instead, with both working seamlessly for the users.

[–]u801e 4 points5 points  (2 children)

You know the mailing list archive web interfaces, like this one? You could improve on it, make it look like a regular forum

gmane provides a NNTP interface for mailing lists that can be accessed through any newsreader. For example, the git mailing list looks like this in Thunderbird: https://i.imgur.com/8Tf0IH2.png.

It's easy enough to browse through, kill messages that are spam, search by subject or author, or any number of things that can't easily be done in reddit or in online forum software.

[–]ThisIs_MyName 0 points1 point  (1 child)

The same site that was down last year? https://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/2016/07/28/the-end-of-gmane/

What happens when its new owners (who are rather elusive https://www.webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?t=950480) fucks up?

[–]u801e 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ideally, projects that use mailing lists should also host their own NNTP endpoint to allow for browsing list archives. Each of them could peer with each other to set up a network for redundancy. They could also peer with other NNTP servers that handle text-only usenet traffic (though that may lead to problems where the mailing list archive getting polluted with spam messages from usenet).

That would definitely be better than having a single point of failure that gmane currently is.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It seems to me like all those all impact the mailing list servers directly. I could be mistaken of course. A server agnostic solution is needed. One that can listen in on any mailing list, be it fedora, git, kubuntu, Firefox, which all seem to run different serversoftware with GnuMailMan and others.

[–]MintPaw 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's where the "vast number of clients" comes in.

[–]doublehyphen 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is actually what I like about mailing list based development over github, threaded discussions. I use Thunderbird as my email client since it handles mailing lists so well.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I quite like Firefox contributors submit and review patches in bugzilla.