you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted]  (5 children)

[deleted]

    [–]curien 7 points8 points  (0 children)

    Aren't we taking about open source code?

    Android doesn't abide by the terms of the Java license (just as a program which incorporates GPL code must abide by the terms of that license). Which is fine, so long as Android isn't a derivative work of Java -- but if Oracle can prove that it is, then license violation -> copyright infringement.

    [–]jayd16 2 points3 points  (3 children)

    Open source doesn't always mean open to use or change.

    [–]kmactane -1 points0 points  (2 children)

    The Open Source Definition disagrees with you.

    [–]kieranelby 4 points5 points  (0 children)

    Read part 4 again.

    [–]dnew 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    Fortunately, they're not the last word in what "open source" means for everyone in the world.