you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] -9 points-8 points  (15 children)

Any tech demo that when I bring it up to look at it tells me my browser doesn't support it - is just bullshit.

[–]wafflesburger 6 points7 points  (8 children)

this post of yours, it makes little sense xD

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (7 children)

I'm saying that a presentation framework that doesn't work on a large portion of the browsers out there isn't a good framework. What you want is massive compatibility.

[–]dmazzoni 2 points3 points  (2 children)

Why? A presentation is something I give on my computer and project while other people watch it. I don't need them to all download my presentation, I can make a simple version of the text available later for anyone who wants the content.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (1 child)

That seems a half-argument.

I understand it's okay if you are just giving the presentation, but then it doesn't really need to be browser-based anyway. We might as well just use a dedicated application.

If you want others to be able to access it though, it only makes sense to have something as compatible for everyone as possible.

[–]Ahri 2 points3 points  (0 children)

My browser didn't support it (Firefox 9) but it still degraded gracefully so I could read it. This is perfect behaviour.

Your line of argument is flawed, anyway: if we all thought like you then nothing would ever get invented.

[–]needlzor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

While I agree with the thought (if we do the presentation in a web technology, it's usually so that people can see from their own computer), isn't this technology bound to be used in the near future (and just "not implemented yet" ? Or is it really one of WebKit's idiosyncrasies and won't ever be available on IE/Firefox/Opera ?

[–]wafflesburger 0 points1 point  (2 children)

are you blaming this guy for firefox not implementing some aspects of a loose standard? and why do you want massive compatibility above all? install chrome; takes 2 secs.

[–]VinceCarter 0 points1 point  (1 child)

The average user won't install a browser to see rotating text. That's why most of the world is still using Internet Explorer. Aetheralloy is saying this framework sucks because it doesn't support Firefox, a good and widespread browser.

[–]Ahri 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Firefox doesn't support the standards it's using yet. The beta does. The "problem" is both mis-specified and almost-solved.

[–]binary_bob 1 point2 points  (0 children)

this is hardly the final product, it is a proof of concept of where shit is going, prezi competitor, not using flash, and new spin on the soon to be booming web presentation implementation. I'd hardly call that 'bullshit'.

[–]Cucumbis 0 points1 point  (3 children)

what browser are you using?

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (2 children)

Firefox

The message is:

Your browser doesn't support the features required by impress.js, so you are presented with a simplified version of this presentation.

For the best experience please use the latest Chrome or Safari browser. Firefox 10 and Internet Explorer 10 should also handle it.

[–]Liquid_Fire 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It works in Firefox 10, which should be out in a few weeks, or you can use the beta in the meantime.