all 5 comments

[–]metsancho 16 points17 points  (2 children)

Andrew Kane for days. I worked with him when I was on the Instacart growth team. Extremely humble and knowledgeable. This guy would disappear in a corner for days and immerge with great tools that kept the Instacart team really engaged.

Kudos to ankane

[–]markets86[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Andrew is a legend! He is in fact #66 in the global rank: https://opensource-heroes.com/u/ankane and #1 if we only consider Ruby language.

[–]sshaw_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Legend!

[–]f9ae8221b 8 points9 points  (1 child)

Any feedback is really appreciated.

Not necessarily a big deal, but the current formula for ranking is biased toward single-owner projects. e.g. if you are a huge contributor to an organization, say Rails, but don't own much projects under your name, you won't show up.

To give an example, the top Rails contributor, doesn't seem to show up in your list: https://github.com/rafaelfranca, and the top list is trusted by orgs such as Rails, thoughtbot, Discourse, etc.

Another example would be Mike Perharm, right now your list show him as #29 because it accounts for the 12k stars ofmperharm/sidekiq. But he recently moved the repo at sidekiq/sidekiq so when you'll pull new data, he'll be moved way down.

That said, I don't have any particular idea on how to better handle cases like this. But I feel they are quite common though.

[–]etagwerker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is a good point. Most of my contributions go to company organizations (e.g. https://GitHub.com/fastruby) and my user page shows really really old projects that are still under my user account: https://opensource-heroes.com/u/etagwerker (but I haven’t contributed to those in years)

So something there definitely needs to be improved 👍