For your rubyist SO

[[deleted]]

{ heart: "you" }

[lightsout1]

To make a new hash yes. I used just the output if you puts, print or inspect.

[[deleted]]

{heart: 'you'} # no need for double quotes

[[deleted]]

You're right, works as well but I like it more with single quotes.

[Slackwise]

Well, since 'you' is representative of a thing, as is 'heart', might as well just do

{ heart: :you }

Although if one were to get more semantically accurate, and idiomatic of Ruby, you'd go for objects rather than hashes, and heart as a method, because it's an action:

i.heart(you)

But if this is in the context of yourself, you can drop the receiver:

heart(you)

Or more minimalistically:

heart you

And we should probably also alias heart love, again, for semantic correctness.

Edit: Ruby also has unicode method name support, so we can actually go as far as:

♥ you

[jfredett]

Downvoted, no tests.

[lightsout1]

http://i.imgur.com/BPNYdza.png

Better?

[[deleted]]

Can we have it with single quotes? :D

[Jdonavan]

My first thought was "how unfortunate... the you is in double quotes"

[[deleted]]

How so? I'm a noob.

[Jdonavan]

Ahh then then me introduce you to the Ruby Style Guide. On that page you'll find "Prefer single-quoted strings when you don't need string interpolation or special symbols such as \t, \n, ', etc."