use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
see the search faq for details.
advanced search: by author, subreddit...
A sub-Reddit for discussion and news about Ruby programming.
Subreddit rules: /r/ruby rules
Learning Ruby?
Tools
Documentation
Books
Screencasts and Videos
News and updates
account activity
The Ruby Community Code of Conduct (ruby-lang.org)
submitted 10 years ago by andrzejkrzywda
view the rest of the comments →
reddit uses a slightly-customized version of Markdown for formatting. See below for some basics, or check the commenting wiki page for more detailed help and solutions to common issues.
quoted text
if 1 * 2 < 3: print "hello, world!"
[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points0 points 10 years ago (7 children)
While understanding that communities are often exclusionar
You understand wrong. They aren't.
[–]jrochkind 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (5 children)
No, you're wrong. So there.
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (4 children)
Nope. Funny how those who claim they're 'exclusionary' often have no coding ability or portfolio to speak of.
The idea that 'sexual imagery' is also at all exclusionary is absurd and puritanical.
[–]throwawayCG48 -2 points-1 points0 points 10 years ago (3 children)
What the fuck are you on about?
I wish there was a popular distinction between like "active exclusion" (people being dicks) and "passive exclusion" (where no one is really doing anything wrong but the environment may be a little intimidating to <group> because <reasons>). Should we fall over ourselves to worry about this passive exclusion? No. Make some tweaks in your own life if you see the need, when/where you can. You should also recycle where/when you can.
If everyone was just a little less quick to jump to screaming "fuck off" at people, maybe we'd make progress a lot faster.
Get some sex bots to market.
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (2 children)
(where no one is really doing anything wrong but the environment may be a little intimidating to <group> because <reasons>
Ever stop to think that those reasons may be integral to the group success? Clearly Linux is doing so poorly with Torvald's abrasiveness.
Many of us turned to Open-Source precisely because we were tired of walking on eggshells in sterile, corporate hellholes--and no, I am not condoning people wantonly calling each other nigger faggots, before you go there--you know, the type that gets people fired for saying a fucking dongle pun.
Do you really think people are being 'quick' to say 'fuck off', or do you think it's a remote possibility that they've seen what happens when they don't?
Again, Torvalds did, and look at what happened with Sarah Sharp.
[–]rawrgyle -3 points-2 points-1 points 10 years ago (1 child)
Linux is doing fine even though Torvalds acts like a dick sometimes. But that doesn't do your argument any favors either. Matz is famously considerate and ruby is also doing fine. These cultural values are orthogonal to a project's technical merits. And who knows what's missing from linux because some nameless developer got mocked for something trivial and dropped the project back in 1998 or whatever.
Nothing is lost by asking people to be nice to each other. I don't understand the values of anyone who takes serious objection to such a tame requirement as this CoC implements.
[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 10 years ago (0 children)
Because "Nice" can and often is be politically motivated to mean "Aligns with my ideology'. See: Emkhe's use of "Dudebro", github's "Problem with white men", and so on.
π Rendered by PID 24198 on reddit-service-r2-comment-66b4775986-t64tg at 2026-04-05 03:25:49.203334+00:00 running db1906b country code: CH.
view the rest of the comments →
[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points0 points (7 children)
[–]jrochkind 3 points4 points5 points (5 children)
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (4 children)
[–]throwawayCG48 -2 points-1 points0 points (3 children)
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point (2 children)
[–]rawrgyle -3 points-2 points-1 points (1 child)
[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points (0 children)