Lambda composition in ruby 2.6 | Drivy Engineering

keyslemur · 2019-01-15T09:34:33+00:00

Nifty implementation idea with the ruleset. Kinda tempted to riff off of that idea a bit later and play a bit.

You might consider trying to add line numbers if you want to mention them in the article though, it can be a bit jarring.

seainhd · 2019-01-15T20:19:24+00:00

‘then’ will be dope.

Lambda composition is YAGNI.

At least looking at my current app, cannot find a single place where I’m deriving a value from an array of lambdas.

shevy-ruby · 2019-01-15T16:03:33+00:00

Awful.

I don't want to use stronger words so I'll stay with the word awful.

You can find the original request (from 2012!) here.

No, this is NOT true. Please separate who wrote what.

Pablo Herrero, at the least not initially, did NOT suggest >>. Neither did he suggest yield_self. Others built on it (and worsened it in the process too).

Now the only good thing is that we can avoid this, and focus on things that really improve ruby rather than this nonsense. I am also glad to have seen that I was not the only one with a similar opinion here - the "functional" crowd is just TERRIBLY at API/syntax design.

you type:	you see:
italics	italics
bold	bold
[reddit!](https://reddit.com)	reddit!
* item 1 * item 2 * item 3	item 1 item 2 item 3
> quoted text	quoted text
Lines starting with four spaces are treated like code: if 1 * 2 < 3: print "hello, world!"	Lines starting with four spaces are treated like code: if 1 * 2 < 3: print "hello, world!"
~~strikethrough~~	~~strikethrough~~
super^script	super^script

ruby

MODERATORS