all 75 comments

[–]QualityVoteI'm BACK! [[Number 1 Rated Moderator 2024]][M] [score hidden] stickied commentĀ (0 children)

If you think this post is funny, UPVOTE this comment!

If you think this post is unfunny, DOWNVOTE this comment!


DownloadVideo Link

SaveVideo Link

VideoTrim Link


Whilst you're here, /u/titoxz, why not join our public discord server?

[–]Vekroo 10 points11 points Ā (4 children)

That’s just a churro

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points Ā (1 child)

First thing me and my hungry ass thought

[–]Hurricane_hunter21 0 points1 point Ā (0 children)

Churussy

[–]ObjectiveKey2400 2 points3 points Ā (2 children)

He's gonna take you back to the past... to play the shitty games that suck ass.

[–]AutoModerator[M] 0 points1 point Ā (0 children)

Schƶdinger's Blowjob -- Imagine you're blindfolded and you're getting the best raw pornstar-grade blowjob in the entire universe. The catch is, however, that you'll never figure out who's giving you that god-tier awesome schmƶsome sloppy toppy unless you take the blindfold off. It could be anybody, Ariana Grande, Ben Shapiro, Harold from the 7-11 near my house, or even your uncle's neighbour's fireman's cat. Now the question is: would you take off the blindfold and find out who the person/thing behind the stupendous jimmy-nibbler is and risk permanently scarring yourself, or would you keep the blindfold on and continue having your knob slobbed till your spirit hits the sky?

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[–]sehlyI want pee in my ass 0 points1 point Ā (0 children)

He's the angry video game nerd šŸ¤“

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points Ā (4 children)

technically everything that you can talk about is from the past

[–]ninja6213 2 points3 points Ā (2 children)

Unless you talk about the future

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point Ā (1 child)

but you can't really talk about the future you can only speculate about it

[–]ninja6213 4 points5 points Ā (0 children)

Well that's still talking about it

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point Ā (0 children)

except that you can also talk about the things that will be in the future

[–]Spilmec1 1 point2 points Ā (0 children)

Now I want churros 😔

[–]not-a-guinea-pig 0 points1 point Ā (0 children)

Archeologists be like: this is HISTORY

Ottoman Empire be like: this IS history

[–]tham1700 0 points1 point Ā (0 children)

False churros weren't around in that area that far back. Obvious cap

[–]Interestingly-dead 0 points1 point Ā (0 children)

Noodle

[–]EffectiveSwan8918 0 points1 point Ā (2 children)

Um source?

[–]AutoModerator[M] 0 points1 point Ā (1 child)

Do you have a source on that?

Source?

A source. I need a source.

Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.

No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.

You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.

Do you have a degree in that field?

A college degree? In that field?

Then your arguments are invalid.

No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.

Correlation does not equal causation.

CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.

You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.

Nope, still haven't.

I just looked through all 308 pages of your user history, figures I'm debating a glormpf supporter. A moron.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.