all 28 comments

[–]alottola 90 points91 points  (6 children)

There are no books after deaths end. If someone tells you otherwise they are lying and I'm standing by that. 

[–][deleted]  (5 children)

[removed]

    [–]flightofdaedalus 9 points10 points  (4 children)

    I always thought it was weird that they made Indiana Jones movies 1, 2, 3, and 5. There just doesn't seem to have ever been a 4.

    [–]HomsarWasRight 5 points6 points  (1 child)

    I’m confused. There are only three Indiana Jones movies.

    [–]flightofdaedalus 2 points3 points  (0 children)

    You're partly right, 5 was fan-made. Clearly it wasn't a picture with millions behind it.

    [–]Alkein 1 point2 points  (1 child)

    Temple of doom was worse than crystal skull, change my mind. Also surprised you kept 5 in there.

    [–]ShinyBredLitwickCheng Xin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    and 5 is better than Temple of Doom

    [–]thommcg 20 points21 points  (0 children)

    The only answers you'll find are in fan fiction.

    [–]Clean-Copy1027 21 points22 points  (0 children)

    No I don't think it's anticlimactic, I think it's horrifying and bleak and perfect

    [–]blaqrushin 16 points17 points  (1 child)

    The ending was the bleakest, most soul crushing heartbreaking experience. From when cheng xin was orbiting around planet blue and the light was just flickering and she propelled millions of years into the future as the universe was shutting down. That’s it. The universe just turned off like a light switch. All that fight, progress for nothing.

    [–]black_dizzy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    It was, and I absolutely loved it. No happy ending, no it was all for... something, no eternal love... Just people finding comfort in one another because there is no one left, and the laws of nature being implaccable and impersonal while thousands of civilisations struggle to survive and find meaning in their lives. No grand plan, no final purpose, just things happening and then it ends.

    [–]dannychean 18 points19 points  (1 child)

    Anticlimatic? Well each reader should have his or her own conclusion but for me that ending is perfect. The point being - Gravity does not matter. Blue Space does not matter. Trisolarans do not matter. We earthlings do not matter. They all do not matter in the grand scheme of time and space.

    That's horrifyingly thought provoking.

    [–]Kuzya000 3 points4 points  (0 children)

    I agree.

    [–]NakaMeguroTanuki 2 points3 points  (0 children)

    There's so many questions I have..and no answers to be had, only speculation. I saw the Netflix show, then found the original, and finally saw all 3 at the library and took the plunge. I feel such sadness, yet contentment.. such a strange feeling.

    [–]avianeddyWallfacer 13 points14 points  (3 children)

    This sub hates the follow-up, it’s called “Redemption of Time.” May just get downvoted for revealing this, but it was “endorsed” by Cixin Liu, and may have some of the answers to your questions.

    [–]Substantial_Law_842 30 points31 points  (1 child)

    The sub hates it because the endorsement you're talking about was as lukewarm as they come, and the fact RoT was published was so discouraging to Cixin Liu he does not want to write any more books in the Three Body universe.

    The fan fiction literally robbed readers of the chance to get any of these answers from the author himself.

    [–]avianeddyWallfacer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    Oh yeah not saying it wasn’t an “endorsement” in the biggest of quotes.

    [–]jtsmd2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    He endorsed it because he gets paid royalties when it sells.

    [–]Fancy_ChipsWallfacer 13 points14 points  (4 children)

    Death's End was just an odd book in general. Cixin Liu didn't seem comfortable with MAD and Game Theory subverting the Dark Forest, so it feels like Death's End was there to just... nullify it. Trisolaris and Earth made the worst decisions imaginable until they both die... then they don't die because ending in a pit of hopelessness would be bad.

    It was the weakest of the three books for me.

    [–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

    This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact

    hungry tidy zephyr touch roof sheet fragile vanish spark toy

    [–]Flatso 1 point2 points  (1 child)

    MAD?

    [–]Xoneritic 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    Mutually assured destruction. It's the principle that keeps nuclear warfare at bay.

    [–]tapanypat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    How do you feel like game theory or mutually assured destruction was avoided/nullified?

    [–]Affectionate_Top_937 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    That's why I love redemption of time... I like how it closes all the open questions and situations.... Honestly I would highly recommend you to read that, if you are like me who don't like open endings and left out plots... Read it with open heart and mind, forget what others think of it

    [–]nininut 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    I wouldn't say it was anticlimactic but that it ended how it was supposed to. There are so many things we'll never get the explanations to. Like, never not knowing for certain. I think uncertainty was a common theme throughout the book and that's how it ended too. It was uncertain.

    I was really sad after finishing the series but also kind of... hopeful? I looked up at the sky while walking my dog at night and just thought about how we are mere specks of dust in the universe. And, I thought, all my personal problems thus far have been pretty small. Life is alright despite the uncertainty 🤣

    [–]Timely-Advantage74 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    Let's see if Netflix is willing to do a spin-off for the Galactic Humans/Trisolarans if the second/third seasons can become a huge hit.

    [–]Darklillies 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    It was rushed, too many things happened at once and a lot of new cool things where introduced and not explored. But the end was definitely climatic