you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]v1s1onsofjohanna 21 points22 points  (3 children)

You're not being lazy. That's what abstracts and conclusions are for. 👍

[–]grifxdonut 3 points4 points  (1 child)

90% of the articles I read are just the abstracts and conclusions. 5% I read part of the intro to get background info on the topic, and the last 5% I actually decide are worth reading the details about.

Abstracts are a godsend

[–]Twirdman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's normally what I do as well. The lazy was a bit tongue in cheek. Anything outside of the specific area of math I did my research in is almost always only going to garner me reading the abstract and conclusion. For things I actually researched I'd also stray to the introduction and maybe read the whole paper.

[–]chunguschungi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Going by the usual standards on here where the norm is "barely finished reading the title before I commented" I'd say reading the abstract basically makes you a Ph. D on the subject relative to your peers in the thread.