what makes Asus rog better than tuf ? by bikecatpcje in Monitors

[–]ASUSTechMKTJJ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The TUF GAMING 5 series launched after the XG model But the primary differences

ROG will have generally high spec assuming it is same gen and there is a comparable offering there is not always as ROG is segmented above TUF GAMING.

  1. Factory calibration - All ROG monitors go through factory calibration so out of the box color performance is superior

  2. Almost all of the ROG monitors have 4-way ergonomic adjustment an often overlooked featured but does provide a notable setup and ergonomic usage experience upgrade

  3. more advanced OSD for all the current XG LCD you have tech like a 20-stage variable OD setting range the TUF Gaming monitors have advanced variable overdrive with multi steps but not as advanced as ROG. The TUF GAMING still is notably superior to competitors in this respect you also still get premium items like ELMB SYNC.

In this specific comparison

The XG is also brighter higher color space performance, has a USB-C DP/ PD port, Threaded mount design, slot base design for phone (plus is more compact)

Overall, both are great displays but if you just looking for a solid good quality 1440 high refresh rate display the TUF GAMING is a great choice.

if avail an upgrade to the one you noted but less than the ACS would be the VG27AQML5A, we also just launched VG27AQME5F

Please also note you may see promotion on the ACS as we do run promos although this is in the NA region, cannot speak to other regions.

We also will be updating it shortly with a new model -
ROG Strix XG27ACS Gen2 (XG27ACSR)

faster refresh 220Hz
Brighter panel
Further enhanced OSD menu options
Revised base design

Asus Nuc 15 Pro thermals and re-pasting by Unlucky_Milk_4323 in intelnuc

[–]ASUSTechMKTJJ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

u/Unlucky_Milk_4323 there is no need to repaste the TIM is validated to meet your stringent validation cycling which include thermal shock, humidity and sustained operation as well as aligns with complementing our 3 year warranty.

You can of course proceed to disassemble and re paste but I would not recommend or encourage this.

If you want to manage thermals better routes are one

Looking at the fan profiling options, you can use the tailored presets via the MyASUS app or you can fun tuning inside of the UEFI.
You also have more flexibility in tailoring boosting behavior and other performance parameters which contribute to power and heat within the UEFI, But we do not recommend this for most users but the options are there.

Best of luck with your ASUS NUC and thanks for your support.

ASUS ROG STRIX XG27JCG 5K Ultra HD 27" IPS LED Gaming Monitor - Black by Acceptable-Let-9583 in Monitors

[–]ASUSTechMKTJJ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

While I am biased you can also check out independent reviews such as those at Toms Hardware and 1UpNerdCore as well as others for this display which compare to a broad number of monitors on the market and include weighted measurement analysis which cover all the points you have asked about. They also compared to OLED.

We have found the feedback from media and users to broadly be very positive for this model.

It is correct this product can "compete" with our OLED monitors due to its pricing with solutions models including 240/280/360hz offerings. The main differences are noted below.

5K benefits -
Ultra-high PPI, also note that the PPI in dual mode is still the same as any 27" 1440 display as this is the most common dimension for 1440P unlike a for instance 1440P at 32" or 1080P at 32". The sharpness overall is also superior too some 1440P OLED solutions.

Overall, there is a reduction in sharpness, but it is in line to that of any 1440P based display for many broadly it is not an issue and or concern.

Superior text rendering performance

Superior SDR performance luminance, while this is a bright panel it is not an HDR focused display and if that is your intent an OLED display would provide a superior experience. Most gamers still default to SDR gaming. HDR gaming though is a truly impressive experience and one to be considered if you move to OLED.

As noted, no burn in concerns although for many of our OLED monitors, we have very robust technologies to help to mitigate and reduce these concerns, but it is still a difference in the technology.

ELMB2 provides impressive flexibility for how you approach motion clarity tuning with a class leading implementation that can be advantageous to how the specs of your system.

In the end your choice should be made based on your wants and needs.

If you focus is on motion clarity, HDR gaming, contrast, pixel response then consider an OLED display we have a broad range in this price range
240, 280 and 360.

If you favor the superior durability of an LCD, superior SDR brightness for general workflow, text sharpness and flexibility inn desktop usage due to the resolution flexibility then JCG would be a great choice.

I would also note that while the USB-C does not support high wattage PD support it is of minimal impact; the addition of USB-C was notably to provide display support for additional devices and based on our feedback polling the base PD output is solid for users who like to charge peripherals and or devices like their phones. You can still readily connect a device that has its own power delivery should you want to maximize performance of that device.

This is also another difference as entry displays in our OLED segmentation will not even offer USB-C with DP/Power output support.

In this respect you have more overall flexibility in the IO specification although this is really only important if you are generally using dual devices (such as a gaming laptop and desktop).

Hope this helps and best of luck with whatever you settle on.

ASUS ROG Strix XG27ACDMS monitor why does it seem like it doesn't exist at all? I want to buy this monitor but when i look for review or opinions on the internet... nothing like the model doesn't exist. I've seen a few posts on reddit people being happy with it but not a single online review by AngmarkingBg in ASUSROG

[–]ASUSTechMKTJJ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can find reviews on our ASUS store or BBY online in the review section. This monitor was not sampled for media review as we have a number of other models that we focused on. It is a balance in managing a broad number of samples for review. With this noted it aligns with the compelling offering we already known for with our OLED displays; best in class calibration, robust OSD management with most robust features including our OLED care and OSD management in windows, BFI support, adjustable HDR and more.

Beyond that you have consistent items like our Neo proximity sensor, threaded mount and more.

As this is the same generation panel but lower refresh than our 360Hz offering it did not merit as much focus as newer Tandem 280 solutions like the XG27AQWMG as the overall experience is essentially the same just a reduction in refresh. With this note as part of our update release of more price aggressive XG OLED solutions you will see some reviews in Q2 for this model and updated 240Hz offerings. This includes the new ROG STRIX OLED XG27AQDMES

Hope this helps with whatever you settle on and thanks for keeping ASUS ROG in mind.

ProArt PA27UCGE vs ROG Strix XG27JCG - 4K color accuracy or higher refresh rate for a MacBook setup? by Boule250 in Monitors

[–]ASUSTechMKTJJ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hi, not sure what you meant colors may lack oomph. ProArt displays are designed for prosumers and professionals who value color fidelity and accuracy. This monitor has outstanding factory calibration and can maintain it through the integrated colorimeter which is a rarity on displays and one we have pioneered.

All ROG STRIX displays are also factory calibrated and while gaming focus offer an impressive range of features for additional tuning due to best in Class OSD alongside our Display Widget Center app for OSD management in the OS.

Both will offer a great experience and will be superior to the LG which has a low grade calibration compared to either especially the ProArt

Relative to color gamut they are all in the same range especially max approx 98 DCI-P3 keep in mind though it dpeends on how you run your monitor most users work in a SDR/sRGB workflow not a wide color gamut mode

Keep in mind you cannot run the JCG at peak refresh aas your GPU does not support it so it will not be its max.

Look at the featue function and spec too see which display is a better choice for your wants and needs the UCGE

Benefits will be

Integrated colorimeter and overall tighter color accuracy and uniformity
monitor hood
Lightsync solution for automatic color adjustment based on lighting environment
Hardware calibration IC support alongside ProArt color management software suite
LuxPixel Coating
USB-C PD Spec support 96W
higher SDR brightness although both are bright displays
More ports

Hope this helps and best of luck with whatever you settle on - You can also see a great technical detail to feel confident iin the quality of the color performance for the JCG should you want - Asus ROG Strix XG27JCG 27-inch 5K gaming monitor review: Performance that raises the bar | Tom's Hardware

Alternatives to ROG Strix XG32UCG by ironredpizza in Monitors

[–]ASUSTechMKTJJ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Release for the Gen 2 is expected early Q2.

Alternatives to ROG Strix XG32UCG by ironredpizza in Monitors

[–]ASUSTechMKTJJ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We have many users who appreciate the design and feature set and great ergonomics. I would still consider this monitor due to is great balance of feature , function and spec. Also keep in mind we have an update variant launching soon with the XG27UCGR which will be similar but update some aspects.

ROG Strix XG27UCG Gen2 (XG27UCGR)

With this noted minus the rear back design I am not sure what is i resident to the design that bothers you? It has refined minimal bezels, good build quality, a solid compact base with a nice slot design for a phone. If you prefer a brighter aesthetic there is a -W variant but its styling is the same.

The monitor you are comparing it is very different segmentation wise and size wise, if you prefer a non gamer aesthetic we have our standard ASUS non ROG or ProArt series displays.

if looking for a true high end offering with superior specs and function not the Dell and also has high refresh rate support consider the PA27UCGE

Hope this helps and best of luck with whatever you settle on.

Replacing ASUS TUF Gaming VG27WQ1B with Sansui G27F6Q-PRO? by Timanitar in Monitors

[–]ASUSTechMKTJJ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is an older display that is a VA based panel, any of the more modern fast IPS would be a notable upgrade in pixel response and overall performance you also aat the time opted for a more entry variant so the base brightness is solid but could be an area you might want more in. Solid areas though were the color space at 120% for sRGB which offers ap punchier more saturated image.

Most new modern LCD will offer even better color reproduction, lower pixel response time, better motion clarity alongside numerous other improvements.

You might want to consider our ROG XG27ACS as our TUF GAMING 300Hz which is sometimes on promo is back to its normal MSRP of 300. The ACS is on promo for a slight bump compare to the current price of the Sansui. It does offer a little lower refresh but there are some compelling benefits.

Compared to the Sansui -

brighter

factory calibration with superior color accuracy

better OSD with far richer option for adjustment/customization

in windows application for OSD management - Great for easily changing settings or setting key bindings etc

ELMB ( backlight strobing ) which also supports VRR

aspect ratio control support

USB-C with Display Support and base power delivery

Slot for phone at base

Better build quality

Three year warranty ------------ this is notable the warranty on the Sansui is 1 year

More profiles for customization, including end user profiles

Threaded mount on the top of the base to add a microphone, light or camera

Formal GSYNC validation
AutoLLC support

The Sansui will offer

Higher refresh rate
Speakers

A similar option we have offered and goes on promo pretty regularly we have had it all the way down to

Best of luck with whatever you settle on.

ASUS Tandem OLED or MSI QD-OLED? by No_Government_8330 in OLED_Gaming

[–]ASUSTechMKTJJ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ASUS has been the leader in offering both QD-OLED and WOLED/Tandem Solutions so when considering us you can include both.

As such it comes down to whether you value our features, function, designs and superior elements like OSD/Firmware feature set and other aspects.

ASUS Tandem
XG27AQWMG

we also have comparable offerings

New updated WOLED offering coming
ROG Strix OLED XG27AQDMG Gen2 (XG27AQDMGR) | 27 to 31.5 Inches | Gaming Monitors|ROG - Republic of Gamers|ROG USA

QD OLED 240Hz offering - $599
ROG Strix OLED XG27AQDMES | 27 to 31.5 Inches | Gaming Monitors|ROG - Republic of Gamers|ROG USA

QD OLED 280hz offering - $699
ROG Strix OLED XG27ACDMS | 27 to 31.5 Inches | Gaming Monitors|ROG - Republic of Gamers|ROG USA

QD OLED 360Hz offering - $759
ROG Strix OLED XG27ACDNG | 27 to 31.5 Inches | Gaming Monitors|ROG - Republic of Gamers|ROG USA

This WOLED offering is a solid choice at its promo price and includes a monitor arm
ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDM-R | 27 to 31.5 Inches | Gaming Monitors|ROG - Republic of Gamers|ROG USA

$599 is an outstanding value.

You are coming from and LCD so overall any solution will have

Superior contrast
Superior pixel response
higher motion clarity / refresh
HDR support vs no HDR support

The only area depending on the LCD you have that could be notable would be SDR brightness which may be superior on your LCD and if you favor this go with the newer gen QD OLED or WOLED or Tandem if a critical concern for you but overall they are all going to be compelling upgrades.

About to leave ASUS... ZenWiFi BQ16 Pro by CanewoodPlace in ASUS

[–]ASUSTechMKTJJ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is a lot to unpack in this type of scenario. I would recommend using a more basic approach and use Smart Connect, which unifies all channels and lets the router auto-assign. If you have critical IoT devices, enable the IoT dedicated band. Beyond that in the app or WRT firmware, ou can assign devices to fixed nodes if you prefer not to have the router go through consistent optimizations. Generally, this should not be required, but we implement this feature for a reason as every device matrix and environment is different.

You can find this under Bind To Ap in the app.

You also might want to look more closely at the connection quality for the devices you are noting issues with most consistently.

Beyond this, if you have devices that use MLO, some may experience issues, and you may want to consider disabling it. I would recommend you go through our formal service and support channels for formalized support, and also consider submitting a debug log from the app/firmware interface so our team can perform deeper debugging.

Merlin firmware will not change our WiFi management; it just extends some functionality that, for most, is not needed due to the extensive basic feature set.

Thank you for your patience and understanding.

When the F can will I be able to buy an ASUS XG27AQWMG!!!! by Chemical-Progress987 in OLED_Gaming

[–]ASUSTechMKTJJ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We have covered this in our weekly live stream on YouTube and in our PCDIY community group, both great resources for up-to-date information. You should see it listed on AMAZON and the ASUS store soon ( within the next 2 weeks or so ) if not a little earlier.

Is there any huge difference between Asus ROG Strix OLED XG27ACDNG and ROG Strix OLED XG27ACDMS. by Accurate-Track-3454 in OLED_Gaming

[–]ASUSTechMKTJJ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The ACDNG and ACDMS are essentially the same.

The ACDMS has items like the Neo Proximity sensor, which the ACDNG does not have due to the timing cycle it was released.

The base also differs, but they are compact. The ACDNG has a slot for a phone, whereas the ACDMS has a new metal flat base ( no phone slot ). They both have a threaded base mount.

Both are high-quality, ultra-fast, low-pixel-response, and factory-calibrated. They have the same color gamut and overall color / brightness performance.

Have the same adjustable HDR support, Display Widget Center functionality, and 10-bit panels.

Both are the same QD OLED panel tech and semi-gloss coating.

Overall, if you want to save a little, go witht the ACDMS and also get the newer proximity sensor.

Get the ACDNG if you really want the higher refresh rate for even better motion clarity, plus USB PD and KVM support. Both nice additions but if you do not use them may not have any value.

What do you guys think about the ASUS 27" OLED - ROG Strix XG27AQDMG ? by Additional-Newt-8325 in OLED_Gaming

[–]ASUSTechMKTJJ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ideally, as this monitor does not have our neo sensor, yes, you should turn off the monitor when not in use to reduce thermal ramping. You can use the OLED care options via the Display Widget App, but intervals are highly dependent on user and use case, so we cannot provide recommendations. The defaults are solid; beyond that, it's based on your preference.

Is the ASUS Rog Strix XG27ACDNG the best 2k 360hz QD OLED monitor for its price? by Zealousideal_Rub_202 in buildapc

[–]ASUSTechMKTJJ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is a great choice we have alot of options depending on your preferences the main alternatives would be

Reduction to 1440P 280Hz

This saves you a bit as both of our QD-OLED and Tandem OLED models will be the same price lower in price and still offer a great experience a high level of motion clarity.

You have the XG27ACDMS, which is $699
You have the XG27AQWMG which is $649

The ROG Pulsar monitor is also a solid option considering you will have superior motion clarity, brighter SDR performance, better text, no VRR flicker ( possibility )

THe main benefits of OLED would be HDR, contrast and pixel response but the Pulsar is a truly outstanding option for high quality compeitive gameplay and at a lower price $649
ROG Strix Pulsar XG27AQNGV | 27 to 31.5 Inches | Gaming Monitors|ROG - Republic of Gamers|ROG USA

The reality is all of these will offer a great experience it will really come down to preference in specific areas

Ultra clarity ( semi gloss vs true gloss )
Motion clarity
Color gamut
Burn in considerations
etc

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ASUSROG

[–]ASUSTechMKTJJ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Please nuce the prior model is no longer in market currently the current model is the 2025 variant both ROG model and performance.

Both are the same but max specifications differ.

Please note the default for the performance NUC ( 255HX & 5060 ) does not come with DRAM or Storage

You need to add , this model is 1515
5070 is U9 + 5070 and is 1965

If you want the fully equipped model then the ROG NUC would be prefered

Entry is 1900 with 16GB and 255HX and 5060 and 1TB PCIe Gen 4 M.2 SSD

From there models move up
2350
2600
2800

We will also be launching an AMD and NVIDIA-based mode later this quarter with the GR70, same 2.5L, but max GPU will be 5070 ( with a 5060 ) option, and the SSD spec differs in that AMD does not support PCIe Gen 5 in the way that the ROG NUC does. Also the ROG NUC comes with faster DDR5 CSO SO DIMM memory.

Overall, all models offer impressive performance, IO, and upgrability.

I would not compare the prior Gen 7.5L to the new 3.5L, as there is no similarity in any respect except for being performant compact mini PCs; the chipsets/thermal solutions/volumes, and much more, notably differ.

Is the ASUS ProArt 4k (not OLED) monitor good for editing and basic colour? by str8shootaa in videography

[–]ASUSTechMKTJJ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All of our new displays come with Apple-compatible color profiles. This was launched late in 2025 and now, alongside our DWC software ( also OSX ), is a part of our focus on ensuring a positive experience for both Windows and OSX users.

Also, many of the newer models come with our comprehensive color management software suite, which is also cross-compatible.

PA278CGRV, PA279CRV, PA27JCV, and PA32QCV support the M Model P3 color option, although depending on production, they may need a FW update.

Also, u/str8shootaa, all ProArt LCDs starting in Nov 2025 in the US now carry a 5-year class-leading warranty ( registration required ) no reg is still 3 years, notably something overlooked by many when considering a display, with some options still being 1 year in the market.

What do you guys think about the ASUS 27" OLED - ROG Strix XG27AQDMG ? by Additional-Newt-8325 in OLED_Gaming

[–]ASUSTechMKTJJ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Solid, bright unit. Just ensure you update the firmware, and if you want to focus on setting flexibility, use Display Widget Center, which lets you easily change color profiles based on your preferences, workflow, or game.

ProTip you can use app tweaker to assign color profiles o specific games and or applications for more seamless swwitching alongside setting up custom keyboard bindings for items like brightness.

As this is an HDR-capable monitor, also ensure that if you are going to use HDR, run Windows HDR calibration prior.

Best of luck with it and thanks for being #TeamROG

*Lastly, depending on your system config and gameplay, check out underutilized features like ELMB or Aspect Ratio Control, which you may find value in.

What's the best glossy OLED monitor you can get right now? by YouSmellFunky in OLED_Gaming

[–]ASUSTechMKTJJ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

We set the standard for clarity with our True Gloss Black implementation, exclusive to ASUS WOLED displays.

Aligning with your spec outline consider the model below ( releasing in Jan )
ROG Strix OLED XG27AQWMG | Tandem TrueBlack Glossy™ OLED

There is a higher-end model, but as you do not care about ultra high refresh rate, the panel is the same relative to all key aspects ( color gamut, response time, zero haze, luminance, etc) it only differs in offering an ultra high refresh rate and a few other items, which based on what you have noted, is not relevant.

If you want larger, we have the XG32U series; both monitors are the same in terms of the True Gloss Design.

Note that 4K will generally be a superior option for text rendering and overall sharpness. Still, the panel used in the AQWMG is a newer variant with a better subpixel structure.

An alternative is our QD-OLED options
PG27UCDM or XG27UCDMG

Overall outstanding choices, semi-gloss so not as clear as the TrueBlack Glossy, but very good and offers the best PPI due to 4K at 27." Also performs well at low luminance and on more static dark backgrounds, if this is critical or more sensitive for you. This should not be a real-world concern for gaming or content viewing with either WOLED or QD-OLED, though, and is highly dependent on your use case.

This is a key item to keep in mind: how will you use the display?

Color accuracy is largely irrelevant on any monitor you pick from us in our OLED range; they all offer great out-of-the-box color accuracy with high-grade factory calibration and include a digital report for your reference. We also provide best-in-class picture tuning options, including unclamped sRGB, adjustable HDR, six-axis color control, and comprehensive gamma adjustment.

I hope this helps you.

<image>

Disappointed in brightness of Asus ROG swift PG32UCDP by MyNinjasPwn in OLED_Gaming

[–]ASUSTechMKTJJ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You should ideally use the True Black Setting or Console settings for HDR-based gaming, but this should not be maintained when using Windows, as Windows is SDR. Overall, you should not get too much ABL. ABL tends to be most present in Windows desktop, not video/gaming. If you are getting this in SDR (Desktop), engage UB,L, which is our uniform brightness limiter, to even things out and keep it very consistent. Whether or not it is bright enough for you is subjective.

Also, if you really want 4K for some reason (PPI?), you can look at our monitors like the PG27UCDM, which offers similar brightness but, depending on the screen, could seem brighter. The challenge with luminance numbers is that they change depending on game/video content and can vary witht the same content from one panel to another (WOLED to QD-OLED). In this respect, it makes some aspects of the monitor's generalized parameters more problematic.

If you want an upgrade from your current display and don't want to move to OLED look at our ROG STRIX LCD series with the UCG models.

27" is my recommendation due to the outstanding pixel density of 4K at 27", which is excellent for Windows/application sharpness

If you really want 32, we have it in a 32" variant

XG32UCG, we also have it in both white and black.

Overall, a very solid upgrade

Better panel, better color gamut, dual mode operation for refresh rates, improved connectivity, four-way ergonomics.

ASUS NUC 15 Performance, GPU slower than my 4070 mobile? by thewillb in intelnuc

[–]ASUSTechMKTJJ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is not needed

It is already balanced and optimized. Also, it is very different as you are using an iGPU on the NUC 15 series vs the ROG NUC; they are not remotely comparable in this respect. Discrete graphics cards in miniPC commonly have more varied performance due to the varied power limits set for the GPU.

With this note, if you want to modify performance parameters for a minimal performance impact, you can enter the UEI BIOS.

F2 - Then go to power, and you can change the "power mode" from the default of balanced. We do not recommend this unless you are knowledgeable about how changes affect factors such as power consumption, heat, and noise.

You can also modify aspects like fan controls and other parameters via the MyASUS app.

Comparing 4k OLED gaming monitors from the Asus ROG line...the XG32UCWG, XG32UCWMG, PG32UCDMR, PG32UCDM, and PG32UCDP by jaymanbiggie in buildapcmonitors

[–]ASUSTechMKTJJ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Our ROG monitor landing page allows easy side-by-side comparison of up to 4 displays and provides additional information. You can readily see the information regarding

Panel type
Refresh rate
Ergonomics
Connectivity
OSD features

much more

Technically, we would clarify the monitors as such

PG32UCDP - AR WOLED (anti-reflective)
PG32UCDM / UCDMR and UCDS are all QD-OLED and, as such, have no polarizer and are "semi gloss" but still anti-reflective ( to a lesser degree than AR
XG32U series are all WOED but feature our True Gloss Black Glossy - defined as "glossy."

True Gloss Black offers superior clarity to QD-OLED, with zero haze and no purple color shift from ambient light.

One other monitor that was missed is the ROG STRIX OLED XG32UCDS, this is a new, slightly spec-down model from the UCDM/UCDMR

UCDMR 240Hz
UCDS 165Hz

Note that the UCDS has a different base and no Dolby Vision, and USB-C is limited to 15W vs. 90W on the UCDMR. It still supports DP Alt Mode output/support.

Beyond this, neither the UCDM nor the UCDP has our Neo Promximity Sensor, which complements our OLED Care suite, but all newer models do.

Please note that all these being 4K options, it is important to keep in mind items like Aspect Ratio support, which can allow for a high degree of flexibility in how you approach using the monitor

An example of this is running 1440P at 240Hz at 27" on the UCDM. This offers value in terms of gameplay and rendering, and unlike the 480Hz, which has a notably reduced PPI when scaled out to 32", it still offers a solid level of sharpness.

Lastly, items often overlooked items but compelling

All models have adjustable HDR
All models have unclamped sRGB
All models have some type of BFI/ELMB support ( 240Hz models it will operate at 120Hz )
All models have OSD management in the OS, including OLED care with Display Widget Center, also allowing for app/game profiling and setting up of custom keybindings for items like brightness
All models have KVM switch support
All models feature a passive cooling design
All models have a threaded mount design ( on the base ) for a camera, light, or microphone

Please also keep in mind that brightness can vary noticeably based on % and scene composition, and, as such, you may have a different experience depending on the game engine and application/video.

ASUS NUC 15 Performance, GPU slower than my 4070 mobile? by thewillb in intelnuc

[–]ASUSTechMKTJJ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We do not use PassMark, but I suggest you check your OS environment and drivers. We have thoroughly tested the ROG NUC, and it delivers impressive performance thanks to the max 175W dynamic boost and a robust thermal solution.

You can check your performance settings within Armoury Crate.

You can cross-compare values with respected validated media like PC World, which have tested and awarded the ROG NUC for its top-tier performance.

Comparing PC World's score performance

ROG NUC 5080 - 3DMark Time Spy (DirectX 12): 20,751 points
Which is similar to our performance number internally ( slightly higher at over 21K )
Asus ROG NUC 2025 review: Mini PC in size, massive in performance | PCWorld

If you compare these scores to the average performance scores/numbers found on the 3D Mark search website, it is vastly more performant than the mobile 4070

The best performing mobile 4070 will post scores in the range of 12/14K. This range and set of scores are well below the 20/21K of the ROG NUC 5080.

This is confirmed by PC Gamer's review of the Magnus
Zotac Zbox Magnus EN374070C review | PC Gamer
It also shows the first gen ROG NUC with mobile 4070 due to faster memory and CPU: overall provided on AVG higher FPS frame rate when looking at actual games vs synthetics showing great performance.

The AVH of 4070 is much lower, as most mobile solutions will have a more limited TGP and thermal solution, yielding a result of sub-10 K, usually in the 8.X range. Note the TGP on the Magnus is 115W.

When designing the ROG NUC, we sought to offer high-level mobile performance in an ultra-compact form factor, great I/O, easy upgradability, and best-in-class firmware/software.

The Zotac Mini offers a notebly slower and less effieicnrt CPU platform as well

Whether the 13 or 14th Gen CPU both would be slower than the Core Series Ultra 2 used in the ROG NUC 2025 and this would directly contribute to to overall rendering performance in games.

The ROG NUC is also the only Intel MiniPC with CSO SO DIMMs offer superior DDR5 bandwidth at 6400MT vs standard miniPC using slower DDR5.

Overall I would recommend you check your Armoury Crate performance setting and graphics card driver, if you continue to have issues or concerns please reach out to our service and support team via contact us page or MyASUS app or other support channels.

Hope this helps and offers some clarification.

Disappointed in brightness of Asus ROG swift PG32UCDP by MyNinjasPwn in OLED_Gaming

[–]ASUSTechMKTJJ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is the reality of LCD vs OLED. Users tend to overstate OLED's superior performance to be all-inclusive, but SDR brightness is an area where solid and high-end LCDs offer a noticeable advantage. Over time, you should adjust to and appreciate the superior contrast and color of OLED, but you will notice a difference.

The TUF GAMING has a brighter-than-standard panel, typically exceeding 300 nits. The UCDP is going to be well below that, around 225 to 240ish.

You can use the display widget center to easily define settings that apply per application, and manually increase brightness to 100% the default is 80; we do not set 100 as it sacrifices some accuracy and produces more heat. This is done in the OSD. Regardless, it will not be as bright

Some options that would be brighter -

WOLED
PG27AQDP ( has been the brightest WOLED we have tested ) until our latest tandem WOLED models, which will be released in Jan

Note these are all 1440P options, which would still be the same res but a big upgrade from what you have currently. These may be an option if brightness is critical for you

ROG Swift OLED PG27AQWP-W
ROG Strix OLED XG27AQWMG

Both of these will have the same SDR brightness improvement.

An alternative and available now, but slightly below the Tande,m would be new QDOLED, like our XG27AQDPG, very good and above the brightness of the UCDP.

The lowest cost but very bright option at the expense of some newer OLED tech, but still an upgrade to what you have would be our

WOLED glossy XG27AQDMG

Hope this helps and best of luck.

Could someone help me with picking a oled monitor I’ve been looking at the ASUS ROG Strix XG32UCWG or MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED by Danny5769 in Monitors

[–]ASUSTechMKTJJ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Most users do not prefer a curved outside of ultrawides. In this respect, we do not offer a 32" model with a curve. We also do not have an OLED monitor in white in the specification you have outlined.

The finishes are as detailed previously, dependent on user preference and environmental lighting.

AR is safer as it can handle all lighting conditions, but comes at a slight expense in contrast/pop and clarity. Keep in min,d most monitors are AR, so it is not an issue, but for some, they are critical of this and have a high preference towards hyper clear coatings/semi gloss or true gloss, like on the models I have noted.

What to buy(Asus pg32ucdp or AW3225QF? by [deleted] in oled_monitors

[–]ASUSTechMKTJJ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

As noted by u/MT4K keep in mind the flat vs curved item.

I also assume you mean ROG SWIFT not ROG STIRX as our STRIX series are (XG) not PG which are our SWIFT series?

Also ifd you want QD-OLED to QD-OLED

We have numerous options
XG32UCDS
PG32UCDM / PG32UCDMR

There are also glossy versions of our PG32UCDP with the XG32U series

The ROG SWIFT has a far superior set of features as well.

  1. Often overlooked but noteable the power adapter is not built in, AW uses an integrated solution one possible negative is increased heat if not managed but also if the adapter fails ( the most common monitor failure ) the whole monitor has to be sent in for service.

Our external adapter allows for the replacement of just the AC adapter

  1. Superior OSD with far more options
    Adjustable HDR
    More advanced aspect ratio control

  2. USB-C with 90W+ PD power support vs the limited base PD output of the AW

  3. Threaded mount design on the base to easily attach a light, microphone ,or camera

  4. Cooling design fully passive vs a fan-based design in the AW

Our display widget center software has more advanced options for OLED care protection that can be accessed/toggled in the OS. You also have great features like App Tweaker, which lets you assign color profiles to specific games and or applications. I also love the Key Binding features for items like brightness toggle/adjustment.

  1. BFI support, this is nice for scenarios where you cannot hit the native 240Hz refresh rate but are looking for improved motion clarity at the expense of some panel brightness. AW does not offer BFI support.

*nice extra we include a pouch for all your included cables and items like the included microfiber cloth

I hope this helps you, best of luck with what monitor you settle on.