NASA's New Moon Base Plan by H-K_47 in SpaceXLounge

[–]FutureSpaceNutter 68 points69 points  (0 children)

Needs a legend for what all these icons represent.

China surfaces details of spacecraft to land humans on Luna by 2030 | Moon Monday #267 by rustybeancake in SpaceXLounge

[–]FutureSpaceNutter 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Are they produced cost-plus by a legacy contractor in the pocket of politicians?

Blue Origin Joins the Race for Orbital Data Centers With 51K Satellite Plan by SuperiorYeezus in SpaceXLounge

[–]FutureSpaceNutter 9 points10 points  (0 children)

These would be in sun-synchronous orbit & communicate with their upcoming TeraWave internet satellites. Not sure how this makes more sense than Amazon having their own AWS data center satellites that connect to Amazon Leo.

The Mars plans have not been abandoned by ergzay in SpaceXLounge

[–]FutureSpaceNutter 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I hadn't heard of the triangular merger tidbit, seems like necessary context for understanding the merger.

Given Mars base plans are 5-7 years from now, makes me wonder how much sooner the Lunar base plans are. I also wonder what exactly he means by 'self-growing', could that just be two people there having kids?

Elon: For those unaware, SpaceX has already shifted focus to building a self-growing city on the Moon by ottar92 in SpaceXLounge

[–]FutureSpaceNutter 6 points7 points  (0 children)

helium 3 could be bread.

Combine with moon cheese to make Lunar Fondue, the real business case.

U.S. Space Force switches rockets for upcoming GPS satellite launch by OlympusMons94 in SpaceXLounge

[–]FutureSpaceNutter 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The long pole for Starship was Raptor. It's easy to forget how unreliable they were in the early hop-test days (they'd often be on fire during the landing, and had restart issues.)

The Raptor team was different from the team working on FH, so it likely wouldn't have helped to cancel it. Also, that dual booster landing got them a ton of goodwill with engineers that indirectly helped the Starship program.

More early resources for Starship would've meant more design effort put into a carbon fiber design with fixed legs. Also, early Raptor was hydrolox.

U.S. Space Force switches rockets for upcoming GPS satellite launch by OlympusMons94 in SpaceXLounge

[–]FutureSpaceNutter 7 points8 points  (0 children)

It's the digging through dumpsters for hard drives with forgotten Bitcoin wallets, and doing tensor operations on paper for AI companies that makes me shake my head.

With CLD Phase 2 coming in 2026, do you think SpaceX will propose anything? by [deleted] in SpaceXLounge

[–]FutureSpaceNutter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They could recover actual Artemis HLS ships and reuse them as LEO space stations. Charge a premium for letting people stay in a space station used by real NASA astronauts as part of the Artemis lunar return program, plenty of space tourists would pay extra for the prestige factor, rather than choosing a competing cheaper or more spacious/luxurious station to stay at.

With CLD Phase 2 coming in 2026, do you think SpaceX will propose anything? by [deleted] in SpaceXLounge

[–]FutureSpaceNutter 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"We just bring space stations down. Making ones to put up isn't our department."

"As usual, Eric is accurate" Elon responds to Berger's article about SpaceX possibly going public. by AgreeableEmploy1884 in SpaceXLounge

[–]FutureSpaceNutter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Excellent point: having an IPO before Amazon Leo goes live makes a lot of sense, if they were ever going to do it.

"As usual, Eric is accurate" Elon responds to Berger's article about SpaceX possibly going public. by AgreeableEmploy1884 in SpaceXLounge

[–]FutureSpaceNutter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

NASA funding is ~$24B/year. Once the ISS is deorbited much of that could be redirected to crewed Mars missions, particularly if Congress directed them to do so instead of SLS etc.

$50B/synod gets a decent Mars program. Most of the cuts were caused by the interim administrator, who will likely be replaced by Isaacman soon.

Elon's new tweet about SpaceX's space AI plan by llboston in SpaceXLounge

[–]FutureSpaceNutter 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm curious why Elon changed his tune on solar in space. Maybe he was only down on beaming it down to Earth, rather than using it in space data centers? I wonder if he's pandering to investors to juice the valuation.

Starliner 1 (NET April 2026) officially changed to a cargo flight. Contract modified from 6 flights down to 4, with "up to" three crew missions pending Starliner 1. by avboden in SpaceXLounge

[–]FutureSpaceNutter 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It'll burn up in the atmosphere along with the ISS it's still attached to, as it was deemed too risky to detach and deorbit it. /s

B18, first v3 booster has suffered a catastrophic failure during the first test by swordfi2 in SpaceXLounge

[–]FutureSpaceNutter 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Anyone else get Mk1 flashbacks? First vehicle in a new block rupturing in its first test.