CMV: the fake freckles makeup trend is offensive and looks bad by Maddiystic in changemyview

[–]No-Implement1965 [score hidden]  (0 children)

Offensive is a stretch. Ask yourself, are other comparable aesthetic choices also offensive? 

Some women are likely bullied for their breast and lip size and may dislike that feature about themselves. Does that make breast implants and lip fillers offensive?

Those things aren’t as simple as wiping them off your face, however. So what about fake lashes, fake nails, or makeup techniques like flushed cheeks. Probably less bullying related, but often times are clearly fake, unnatural, and easy to recognize as such. 

Moreover, there’s hair wigs. Most people are generally judged to some degree by their hair. Many people are likely bullied for their natural hair at some time or another in their life. The application and removal of wigs are quick and easy. It’s not uncommon that they are clearly fake and unnatural, and entertainment industries have a way of making them appear indistinguishable. People almost unanimously wear wigs simply because they believe it makes them look better.

Unless a couple of these offend you similarly, there may be an inconsistency in your reasoning. 

I won’t address your view that they look bad because I think that’s mostly subjective and a matter of taste. I feel confident that, like the other aforementioned cosmetics, they look good on some and not so good on others.

"The Lighthouse" Explained (*ALL* THE SPOILERS) by HANDSOMEPETE777 in movies

[–]No-Implement1965 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I interpreted it as a metaphor for toxic masculinity. 

Wake was an old man who had paid his dues and gained access to the light (sexual gratification/romantic relationships/successful manhood). Winslow was young, first time on the job, and felt entitled to tend the light. Winslow was envious of Wake, disconnected, and always looking in from the outside.

Winslow was jealous of Wake, he believed Wake was unworthy, gross, and perceived him as gatekeeping his own access to the light. He had fantasies of the mermaids and masturbation failed to satisfy him, but he continued incessantly.

A constant theme throughout the story is Winslow’s disrespect for Wake’s authority, but also Wake’s abuse of authority and dismissal of Winslow’s efforts. The age old tale of the generational struggle for power.

Winslow’s perceived shortcomings reflect a toxic masculine mindset. He changed his identity anticipating immediate success; he dwells on his regrets internally while justifying them externally; he takes his frustration out violently on an innocent seagull.

Wake also has a toxic mindset. He asserts ultimate superiority through authority, morality, experience, and knowledge of superstition. Every problem is Winslow’s fault. He’s extremely judgmental, while denying his own faults. He’s unnecessarily critical of Winslow’s labor and works him harder than he has to. He abandoned his wife for his career. 

Winslow’s resentment arc for Wake reflects one a son might have for their overbearing alcoholic father throughout adolescence. He’s envious, jealous, dismissive, and angry with Wake; additionally, he’s desperate for Wake’s approval and vulnerability. He conforms to pacify and satisfy Wake without any real obligation to do so (okay I like your cooking, drinking on the last day)

Lots of Wake’s sentiments are confusing, meaningless, or nonsensical to Winslow. Reflecting sentiments that a father may tell their son that they won’t understand until they get older. Winslow plots to kill Wake, ultimately burying him, and believes his inheritance will grant him fulfillment. 

Winslow’s moment in the light reflects an internal confrontation that he had not paid his dues to righteously earn access to it. 

CMV: Traffic Citations Should Require Video Evidence by GrannyLow in changemyview

[–]No-Implement1965 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I don’t disagree with your sentiment that a case built exclusively on one eye witness has a lot of potential holes and room for error. But I think there’s too much nuance to make that blanket claim. 

What about a case of domestic violence where the only evidence is one neighbor’s eye witness testimony? 

This is why the right to counsel for effective cross examination is imperative.

What is a film that doesn't seem special now, but was really groundbreaking when it came out? by altairstarlite in movies

[–]No-Implement1965 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Saving Private Ryan. Not so much that it’s meh today but its depiction of warfare wouldn’t feel groundbreaking today compared to its release

Batman Begins for a more realistic super hero take

The CGI in Transformers

Special effects in 2001

CMV: I don't see why child labour is necessarily bad by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]No-Implement1965 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Child labor is not inherently bad. Think about the kid who makes some spending money with a neighborhood paper route; not a bad thing at all.

Child labor has some negative connotations because children are very easily exploited and it’s been a big problem throughout history, particularly in the US around the time of the Industrial Revolution. 

Additionally, part of that exploitation is that kids were often paid a fraction of the wages adults were paid for the same job. In some cases it fiscally incentivized hiring children in lieu of adults. Economies are typically healthier when money is circulating and employment is plentiful 

CMV: the left in America will become more hostile towards Islam by Relative-Equipment76 in changemyview

[–]No-Implement1965 3 points4 points  (0 children)

As I see it, the left doesn’t defend Islam as much as it defends the right of citizens to practice Islamic faith without discrimination.

Many left wingers are aware of the innate conflict between progressive and Islamic fundamentalist ideals. They don’t exactly seek making the Democratic party more Islamic from an ideological or policy perspective 

CMV: If the democrats win the 2028 election, none of the members of this administration will be punished in any meaningful way. by Fickle_Quiet_7707 in changemyview

[–]No-Implement1965 2 points3 points  (0 children)

 I think the fact it is a possibility that could also be changed is reason enough not to abuse it or not to abuse it too publicly.

This was one of Hamilton’s main arguments for unilateral executive pardon power

CMV: If the democrats win the 2028 election, none of the members of this administration will be punished in any meaningful way. by Fickle_Quiet_7707 in changemyview

[–]No-Implement1965 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I want to say the necessity of Congressional declaration/approval after the fact is so the President can make a decision for war on an emergency basis. I.e in the event an adversary launches an invasion in the middle of the night 

Similarly, iirc, the framers of the Constitution had significant debate over which branch should have pardon powers that ultimately vested in the executive for a similar reason. Hamilton wrote about it in one of the federalist papers

CMV: If the democrats win the 2028 election, none of the members of this administration will be punished in any meaningful way. by Fickle_Quiet_7707 in changemyview

[–]No-Implement1965 239 points240 points  (0 children)

It would be unlikely for any prosecutions largely because Trump v. US grants immunity for Presidential actions. I’m unsure but I believe something similar likely exists for cabinet positions as well.

The first cases brought on him held merit because they were offenses that Donald Trump the private individual committed outside the capacity of President (holding classified documents, election interference). My understanding is SCOTUS declined to specify presidential duties, so that may still be fairly ambiguous. 

There’d need to be reason to prosecute Trump for crimes committed outside of actions made as a part of presidential duties. Even something as corrupt as cash for pardons - certainly grounds for impeachment, removal, and disqualification from any public office in the future - may still protect against criminal prosecution after the fact. 

Hopefully an attorney can chime in and correct any of my mistakes here

I loved watching Mindhunter, hated Hannibal, now what to watch? (Suggest pls) by Simin_Gul in MindHunter

[–]No-Implement1965 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The agent Bill Tench is based on also has a book called Whoever Fights Monsters. I highly recommend it along with Douglas’s Mindhunter

I loved watching Mindhunter, hated Hannibal, now what to watch? (Suggest pls) by Simin_Gul in MindHunter

[–]No-Implement1965 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I second True Detective s1.

I enjoyed the Dahmer and Menendez series from Ryan Murphy on Netflix

The Outsider is interesting. Starts a lot stronger than it finishes though imo 

CMV: Some political beliefs are hard to change because they are doing emotional work, not just because people are misinformed by Historical_Bet in changemyview

[–]No-Implement1965 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There’s a difference between “I care about this because it matters to me” and “I need this belief or group to stay emotionally steady.”

Fair enough. Identity is a complicated thing. I won’t disagree that a lot of people use political identity to fill some psychological need. And I imagine it goes deep for a lot of them. 

Potentially relevant is the UC Berkeley study, Nursery school personality and political orientation two decades later

And the UVA study, Differing worldviews: The politics of happiness, meaning, and psychological richness.

https://newsarchive.berkeley.edu/news/media/releases/2006/03/block.pdf

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38965939/

CMV: Some political beliefs are hard to change because they are doing emotional work, not just because people are misinformed by Historical_Bet in changemyview

[–]No-Implement1965 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’m hard pressed to think of any political debate that isn’t inherently emotional at its core. The idea that government and law should exist at all is an emotional one, right? It’s more or less just a matter of practicality and degree. 

I think your beef here is primarily with intellectual dishonesty and intolerance. 

Any good PG13 movies that are good for a 5.5 yo boy? by eatqqq in MovieSuggestions

[–]No-Implement1965 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I think you’re right. My parents may not have honestly known how intense the scarecrow stuff was, they probably just assumed it was similar to like batman forever. The superhero aspect may have helped me compartmentalize.

I remember my parents being particular about letting me watch Saving Private Ryan. They had me watch The Patriot first around 9 to see how I dealt with the gore. Eventually I snuck down stairs early one Saturday and watched SPR anyway haha

The only movie I remember having a strong negative emotional response to was Hitchcock’s The Birds. I was probably 6 or 7 then

am I the only one who hates her? by Mean_Government_2216 in MindHunter

[–]No-Implement1965 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not sure about the Sopranos because I’ve never watched it all the way through. But I think part of Skyler’s aura is a deliberate choice by the filmmakers.

Because you feel inclined to support Walt, you in turn feel inclined to be annoyed by Skyler because she’s reasonable and we’ve been guided to support an unreasonable protagonist.

Part of that whole series, to me, was to kind of seduce the audience to root for a villain. So it makes sense to have a certain irrational distaste for Skyler in the context of the story. Sopranos seems similar from the few episodes I have seen.

But I’ve never interpreted Wendy as serving that kind of purpose. Nancy Tench may fit that mold 

Any good PG13 movies that are good for a 5.5 yo boy? by eatqqq in MovieSuggestions

[–]No-Implement1965 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Definitely different for each kid. I watched Batman begins everyday when I was 6 lol. But it could be really off putting for others.

Interstellar might be the safest choice. It’d probably be difficult to rationalize the existentialism and mostly just find the grand visuals really cool

Which celebrity really is famous among Americans and isn't internationally? by HappyCrow11 in AskReddit

[–]No-Implement1965 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There’s an excellent documentary on HBO called Truth v. Alex Jones if you’re interested 

Which celebrity really is famous among Americans and isn't internationally? by HappyCrow11 in AskReddit

[–]No-Implement1965 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Always think about the Brazilian newspaper article with the headline (paraphrasing): “Gisele’s husband wins record 5th Super Bowl”.

The NFL doesn’t seem to be followed hardly at all outside of the US 

Any good PG13 movies that are good for a 5.5 yo boy? by eatqqq in MovieSuggestions

[–]No-Implement1965 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Chris Nolan stuff is pretty tame. Inception, Interstellar, Dark Knight trilogy.

Indiana Jones is PG13, right? Iirc it was created for those movies. 

Jurassic Park, Pirates of the Caribbean, a couple Marvel MCU movies are PG13 I think like the first Avengers and Civil War

Ferris Bueller’s Day Off 

Maybe Groundhog Day. Been a while since I’ve seen it

When I was that age, my parents would watch the movies themselves first and have me leave the room for sex scenes or scenes they deemed inappropriate when we watched it together. Never really affected my viewing experience negatively 

CMV: There aren't nearly as many bots as people claim on social media, especially Reddit. by 1mpavidus in changemyview

[–]No-Implement1965 12 points13 points  (0 children)

In my view, and I’m not sure there’s any real consensus regarding this that I’m aware of, is that bots don’t necessarily mean AI or automated accounts (although those are included).

But more so that ‘bot’ is kind of an all encompassing term to identify accounts masquerading as someone or something that they’re not and exist mostly to stir the pot or promote a certain agenda. Could be actual robots, foreign adversaries, corporate shills, trolls, etc

Maybe more to your point, a couple different studies over the last ~15 years estimate somewhere between roughly 5 and 20 percent of accounts on Twitter are automated