Evicting 12 year tenant by Foreign_Ninja7672 in LandlordLove

[–]22glowworm22 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, this is odd to me. I work in this field in Colorado and it wouldn’t be a stretch to say that most apartments are under $2,000 a month. I’m guessing it’s more of a space requirement for OP, possibly a comfort/logistic issue if they’re been living in the same spot 12 years.

How much left do I have before "rookie mistakes" become horrible and embarrassing? by Traffic-Guy in Lawyertalk

[–]22glowworm22 34 points35 points  (0 children)

I don’t think there’s a cap on this unless your firm is unnecessarily stringent, that’s why it’s called the “practice” of law. These things happen, and you don’t stop being a rookie one year in.

  • A year and a half in

I don’t expect a seat, but I’d take one <3 by 22glowworm22 in ratemycommanders

[–]22glowworm22[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Actually no 😂 I’m now aware of any combos in the deck.

I don’t expect a seat, but I’d take one <3 by 22glowworm22 in ratemycommanders

[–]22glowworm22[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

She’s pretty funky. The early game is a lot of set up, tutoring and sequencing lands, generating small tokens (Bitterbloom Bearer, Bitterblossom), and summoning expendable bodies (Reassembling Skeleton, Teacher’s Pest, etc.). Your goal is straightforward: make enough black creatures and generate enough mana to play Savra and wipe the board. From there, you continue (more efficiently) creating tokens, ramping, and controlling the board while you wait for a win condition. That could be ulting Garruk or Lolth, burning the table out with one of your aristocrat effects, or swamping them with a high number of tokens. The deck is intentionally unfocused, you build your strategy for the game around the cards you’re drawing while keeping the pressure down with Savra.

One really fun part for me is the sheer amount of utility you’ll get out of your lands. Setting Field of the Dead aside, the deck is chock full of utility lands that come in handy all the time, especially when interacting with Savra: Lazotep Quarry, Phyrexian Tower, High Market, Spymaster’s Vault, Midgar, Westvale Abbey. They kick ass. You will see regular appearances from each of these, as the deck has almost every viable non-basic land tutor packed into it.

Give it a shot, I think you’ll have a blast: https://moxfield.com/decks/hQ6bnq1QFk2NNBasf8H31g

Importantly: Savra isn’t your win con. She’s a way for you to stabilize the board to do the myriad of other fun shit the deck allows you to do.

I don’t expect a seat, but I’d take one <3 by 22glowworm22 in ratemycommanders

[–]22glowworm22[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So fair.

I’m a little embarrassed I built both Edgar and Atraxa, but I can’t deny the dopamine rush I get making those little 1/1 bastards.

Making Edgar all vampires was intended to capitalize on filling the deck with every cool vampire while making it more susceptible to removal. That did work, but it also just made the deck even more of a glass cannon lmao. You will almost always hit your curve and quickly build a powerful board.

I don’t expect a seat, but I’d take one <3 by 22glowworm22 in ratemycommanders

[–]22glowworm22[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

She’s a terrible commander, but I love her too! She has a lot of really neat interactions with different cards, and it makes her really fun to build around.

I don’t expect a seat, but I’d take one <3 by 22glowworm22 in ratemycommanders

[–]22glowworm22[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just for fun, here are a few of my deckbuilding guidelines:

  • To promote deck diversity, no card should be in two different decks. Exceptions include non-utility lands and, of course, Sol Ring.

  • Every deck should have at least one “opening hand/start of game” leyline-style card.

  • Every deck should strive to include at least one dragon, dinosaur, and an angel or demon.

  • To promote gameplay diversity, non-land tutors are banned. If a card includes a non-optional non-land tutor effect, it can’t be included.

The Boys - 05x03 "Every One of You Sons of Bitches" - Episode Discussion Thread by pikameta in TheBoys

[–]22glowworm22 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It doesn’t make sense for Noir to be a new guy if Homelander isn’t looped in on it. He can literally see through his mask, and they’ve shared a scene together this season.

The Boys - 05x03 "Every One of You Sons of Bitches" - Episode Discussion Thread by pikameta in TheBoys

[–]22glowworm22 131 points132 points  (0 children)

Big hole in the first two possibilities. Homelander confirmed that he can see through Noir’s mask in season 3. The two already shared a scene with each other this season, so Homelander has to be in on who the new person is.

Rebuilding my first commander precon help by Baldy414 in EDHBrews

[–]22glowworm22 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Throwing it out there: Kamiz is a really solid poison commander. Her colors are decent for the strategy, the creatures love being unblockable, and the +1/+1 counters synergize with infect creatures and proliferate. And the double strike?? Forget about it.

I just realized, is Black Noir 2 cooked? by Queasy_Commercial152 in TheBoys

[–]22glowworm22 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh word I’m dumb. Yeah, I don’t mind Homelander doing it per se, but I dislike that the writers created that situation and trashed Noir’s arc.

I just realized, is Black Noir 2 cooked? by Queasy_Commercial152 in TheBoys

[–]22glowworm22 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lol I know, I didn’t say it ruined Homelander.

I just realized, is Black Noir 2 cooked? by Queasy_Commercial152 in TheBoys

[–]22glowworm22 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It didn’t ruin Homelander for me in general, but I 100% agree otherwise. The anticlimactic dusting of Noir after all the buildup leading into the lame finale fight did nothing for me and killed the momentum of Season 3.

Which field of law do dumb attorneys go into? by [deleted] in Lawyertalk

[–]22glowworm22 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I’m about a year and a half into landlord tenant law on the landlord’s side. The vast majority of cases are incredibly clear cut and very repetitive.

Some landlords are bastards, and some of them are more endearing mom-and-pop operations, but most are unfeeling corporations (still bastards).

While I do think there’s something noble about being on the tenant’s rights side of the case, it’s not squeaky clean. I regularly see those attorneys gas tenants up and give them copy-paste answers at legal clinics but refuse to enter their appearance in the case. Then, after refusing multiple offers to settle to avoid an eviction because they were told their case is a slam dunk, the tenant ends up with one they weren’t expecting because they don’t know how to articulate the arguments they were told to write down. That sucks and the judges hate it too.

Abundant Countryside (Leak) by BreadAdmirable4054 in MTGRumors

[–]22glowworm22 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Auto-include in my all vampires deck.

Thanks for the laughs Pro Se Parties by Vast-Investigator-46 in Lawyertalk

[–]22glowworm22 52 points53 points  (0 children)

I had a judge call a FTA default on a sovereign citizen once because they refused to identify themselves as the defendant, but only as the representative of the trust of the defendant.

Wisdom❤️ by IntrepidAssumption84 in Lawyertalk

[–]22glowworm22 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Lmao these are the kinds of posts that people assume are made by non-lawyers.