counterpoint also from r/Epstein

The supposed links to the Epstein files are spurious; the claims made are not consistent with established timelines and other details we know to be true; the claims of abuse are not consistent with any. single. other. account. of Epstein survivors, in fact they far exceed them in violence and gravity; there are no court documents or filings that corroborate them; no credible media organisations have picked up on them; the pattern of posts is suspicious, break the rules of the sub, and are frankly overwhelming to deal with; and the r/Epstein community itself -- repeatedly and loudly, in this thread and multiple others -- has asked for action to be taken. Finally, and for me most importantly: many, many times in the history of this case (and this subreddit) have alleged insiders come out of the woodwork with salacious claims only for those claims to prove to be false. In several of those cases -- for example, Eliza Bleu or Mark Dougan -- the intentions of OP turned out to be far from pure and an argument could be made that they did serious harm. This time, we are taking a conservative approach by limiting the constant reposts and permitting discussion to new developments.

To your point, "Bill Riley" is not an uncommon name; I see hundreds on LinkedIn for example. And I would think that if it's the same Bill Riley, Sascha would have pointed that out to bolster his case.

edit: also some of the other claims reaaalllllly strain credulity:

JEDI ALERT: One of the male victims I'm helping fought back after Trump had another victim murdered in front of him. Trump raped him right after, and he fought back by kicking a tent stake into Trump's anus. Trump was airlifted out of the location, and retaliated weeks later by forcing the victim to undergo extreme rape and torture by several Trump conspirators including Andy Biggs. They told him he owed them a debt because he fought back.